*Fleet and Priscilla White addressed the Boulder City Council on this
subject, August 6th, JonBenet's 12th birthday.Address to the Boulder City Council, August 6, 2002
In February of 2000, a woman came forward with allegations and
accusations against our family. The woman falsely alleged that we were
ritual child sex abusers and involved in the homicide of JonBenet
Ramsey. She also falsely alleged that we were part of a conspiracy that
included prominent people in Boulder and elsewhere in Colorado. The
woman and her allegations were first publicized by the E.W. Scripps
owned Boulder Daily Camera in a libelous front page headline story on
February 25, 2000 and the following day by another Scripps paper, The
Rocky Mountain News. The Daily Camera article, authored by former Daily
Camera editor Barrie Hartman, falsely implied that JonBenet had been
tortured and killed at our home on December 25, 1996 when "an
asphyxiation technique used to stimulate an orgasmic response during a
child sex and porno 'party' went too far."
The story noted that while the Boulder Police did not find the woman to
be credible, former District Attorney Alex Hunter regarded her as being
"very believable". The article included a warning from Mr. Hunter to the
Boulder Police, if they failed to investigate the woman's accusations,
he would take the matter to the US Attorney. It was Mr. Hunter's
favorable assessment of the woman that emboldened the Daily Camera, its
publisher Colleen Conant and Scripps' lawyers to publish the article, an
article they knew would open the way for publicizing additional details
and embellishments of the woman's false accusations. Those libelous
details were quickly provided by the Longmont Daily Times-Call, CBS
owned KCNC News, Clear Channel KHOW AM 630 talk radio, FOX News and
Boulder Community Access Television. There were also months of Internet
leaks, interviews and anonymous commentary.
The public dissemination of the woman's false accusations that was
intentionally set in motion by Mr. Hunter and The E.W. Scripps Company
resulted in the most damaging defamation that can be imagined.
Notwithstanding its justified skepticism of the woman's truthfulness,
the Boulder Police Department responded to the goading of the Daily
Camera and the bullying of Mr. Hunter by immediately commencing a highly
publicized investigation.
Unsatisfied, the Daily Camera published an editorial on March 22, 2000,
criticizing the Boulder Police for not taking the woman's accusations
seriously. In response, the Boulder Police Department dutifully strung
out the investigation for eleven weeks. On May 15, 2000, Chief Beckner
issued a public statement noting the conclusion of the investigation of
the woman's accusations. In his statement, Chief Beckner indicated that
none of her accusations and claims could be linked to the Ramsey
homicide. What was not mentioned by Chief Beckner is the fact that the
woman was a fraud and had broken the law by knowingly making false
reports of serious criminal activity to the Boulder Police Department,
the Boulder District Attorney and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Nor did Chief Beckner make any reference to the central roles played in
her criminal episode by a number of people including Mr. Hunter, Mr.
Hill, Mr. Singular and Mr. Hartman as well as other employees and
representatives of the E.W. Scripps Company. At a meeting at our home on
June 13, 2000, Chief Beckner told us that he doesn't "battle someone who
buys ink by the barrel."
Earlier this year, we requested criminal justice records relating to the
investigation of the woman's accusations from Chief Beckner and District
Attorney Mary Keenan pursuant to Colorado criminal justice record
statutes. The Boulder Police have refused to release any of the records
in its possession. The District Attorney, however, has released to us
all documents in its possession relating to the woman's accusations and
the ensuing investigation. Among those documents are notes taken at a
February 16, 2000 meeting at the home of Mr. Hartman. Present at the
meeting were Mr. Hartman and Mr. Hunter, as well as a lawyer, Lee Hill,
who was representing the woman. Also in attendance was Stephen Singular,
a Denver author of true crime books. In 1999 during the Ramsey grand
jury investigation, a book authored by Mr. Singular was published. The
premise of Mr. Singular's book was that a group of people in Boulder and
possibly a Boulder municipal employee, were engaged in pedophilia and
pornography and may have been responsible for the death of JonBenet or
participated in a conspiracy to cover up the circumstances of her death.
Mr. Singular further speculated that the cover up conspiracy may have
plagued the Ramsey investigation from the outset and could explain why
charges had not been brought against someone for JonBenet's homicide. In
his book, Mr. Singular claimed that he had met with Mr. Hunter on
several occasions and that Mr. Hunter had urged him to pursue his
theories. Mr. Singular dedicated his book to Mr. Hill.
The documents that we received from the District Attorney strongly
support what we have suspected for some time. The investigation of
JonBenet's homicide has been conducted in a moral and ethical vacuum and
has been driven by petty self-interest, vindictiveness, and a profound
disregard for the criminal justice system and common civility.
On June 24 of this year, we applied to the Boulder District Court for an
order directing the City, Chief Beckner and the Boulder Police
Department to show cause why they should not release its records
relating to the investigation of the woman's false accusations. The
Court has set a hearing for August 16th. Our family and the public are
entitled to each and every government document that may shed light on
the deceit and misconduct of Mr. Hunter, Mr. Hartman, Ms. Conant and
anyone else responsible for promoting and publicizing the woman and her
false accusations. Forcing us to bring this matter into the District
Court further defines the leadership of Boulder municipal government to
be little more than a group of selfish and cowardly civil servants with
no genuine or abiding interest for the rights of Boulder citizens or
their criminal justice system.
In May 2001, John Ramsey's criminal defense lawyer, Harold Haddon,
appeared in Denver at a panel discussion. The topic was "The Media and
the Bar." Ironically, the moderator was one of Patsy Ramsey's criminal
defense lawyers, Patrick Burke. In response to a question from Mr. Burke
regarding what ethical rules had applied to the interaction of lawyers
with the press in the Ramsey Investigation, Mr. Haddon arrogantly
decreed: "There weren't any rules that applied to anybody in the legal
profession, members of the District Attorney's office or representatives
of the Ramseys and various witnesses." Mr. Haddon was wrong. There were
rules. And there were laws. What Boulder and the State of Colorado
lacked were government leaders, prosecutors, judges and attorney
regulation and law enforcement officials who possessed the courage and
the integrity to enforce them.
We request that the City of Boulder reconsider its position and release
the criminal justice records that we have requested pursuant to Colorado
law.