jameson's Links  Terms of Service  News  Chat  Forum Archives  Cord Photos  Email  

jameson's WebbSleuths

Subject: "Other items of interest in People articl"     Previous Topic | Next Topic
Printer-friendly copy    
Conferences Laci Peterson Topic #695
Reading Topic #695
mBm
Member since Jun-6-03
199 posts
Aug-29-03, 06:55 PM (EST)
Click to EMail mBm Click to send private message to mBm Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
"Other items of interest in People articl"
 
   There were many new items mentioned in the People story. One was the fact that two men were seen yelling at Laci to make McKenzie quit barking. (This might also coincide with other reports that she was having trouble controling the dog.)

Another was the statement that her body had on light colored maternity pants (when Scott and all witnesses said she had on black pants and a white top.)

Of even greater interest to me was the MPD* saying the burglary across the street took place on the 26th rather than the 24th. A news photographer said this could not be so because on the 26th he was stationed at the scene with his camera and would have been aware of something like a burglary taking place. I believe the owners also said the burglars did not bother to take some expensive jewelry lying out in the open.

*Was this the same MPD that issued a statement back in the Yosemite murders that (after the first three victims were found) citizens could rest easy now because they were certain they had the perps in jail. (Of course, they did NOT, because another murder occurred just a week or so later. Watch the Cary Stayner case on tv some time.) Seems they rounded up all the wackos, junkies, burglars, pedophiles, etc., and put them in jail. I wonder why these same creeps were not rounded up and investigated in Laci's case.

I don't know how People got their info, what with the gag order, but I can't see that what they revealed will be of help to the prosecution.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
mBm
Member since Jun-6-03
199 posts
Sep-03-03, 01:37 AM (EST)
Click to EMail mBm Click to send private message to mBm Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "Article prompts Peterson's Dad to make s"
In response to message #0
 
   On LKL Tuesday nite, Scott Peterson's father issued a statement in regard to the People Mag article. He said it is possible that Laci might have been alive from 4 to 6 weeks after her abduction. He seems to base his statement on the assumption that Conner was full term and was born alive and then killed. He doesn't theorize how he was born, since reports have indicated that Laci had not actually given birth before she was killed.

I wonder where or from whom the author of the article got his/her information.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
momof6moderator
Charter Member
1692 posts
Sep-03-03, 07:12 AM (EST)
Click to EMail momof6 Click to send private message to momof6 Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
2. "RE: Article prompts Peterson's Dad to ma"
In response to message #1
 
   LAST EDITED ON Sep-03-03 AT 07:23 AM (EST)
 
Baden had said reports indicated, that Laci's cervix was closed indicating that she had not given vaginal birth to Conner. He also stated that there were no MAN MADE incisions on Laci's abdomen, the cut that was there, he determined at that time was from debris or normal decomposition. He also, along with Lee, theorized at that time, that Conner's cut was also either from debris or from the rocks on the beach. They said that the cuts were made post mortem for both.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
DragonFly2
Member since Jun-23-03
193 posts
Sep-03-03, 08:18 AM (EST)
Click to EMail DragonFly2 Click to send private message to DragonFly2 Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
3. "RE: Article prompts Peterson's Dad to ma"
In response to message #2
 
   And if Laci had been alive for that long after her abduction, why would the killer risk dumping her body where so much attention was being focused? Yes- I know- "The killer was trying to frame Scott"- but if that were so, why weigh her body down- the killer would WANT her body found in that area....yes, it did happen, but it also could have easily NEVER been found.....very risky for someone trying to frame an innocent husband.

What motive could there possibly be for someone to go to such elaborate lengths to frame Scott?


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic