Since Spade and Tricia seem to work tirelessly to find attention for their ill conceived theories and poorly done science projects...NOW IS THE TIME FOR THEM TO TAKE LIN WOOD'S CHALLENGE! If their work is so damn important let's see if they have the guts to take him.

Wood, who on Tuesday filed a defamation suit against Fox News, says Griffith's statements are absolutely and unequivocally false. The tape is a genuine representation of Patsy Ramsey's distress and further proves that none of the Ramseys was involved in JonBenet's murder, Wood said. I challenge anyone who says to the contrary to publicly release their recording and the full report of any so-called expert who claims to hear Burke and John on the tape, Wood said. I will be more than happy to take the sworn testimony of any such individual as part of the Ramsey v. Fox News litigation and prove that person upon cross-examination to be a fraud.

Trish's statement to the paper was just BORG ranting, not to be taken seriously at all. Anyone reading the forums knows that when she first got the 911 tape she posted that she just heard typing - - it was later that she swore she had lied - that all along she heard Patsy's voice. Not Burke's voice but Patsy's. And not that has become twisted into evidence that Burke was in the room and not asleep... Just BORG idiocy.

Only thugs make this kind of threat. Why does he care what Candy has to say? He loves to suggest he's all hooked up and all imporant. Fact is, he's simply a thug with science projects, lies and veiled threats in his little wimpy toolbox.

It takes a lot of nerve for someone like Spade to make reference to the KARMA TRAIN. I'd say his is long overdue!

I won't quit posting about the case or about him...his involvement is far too questionable and his character is far too dark to look the other way.

Yes, what he posted about Candy is outrageous! And Tricia calls him "Jonbenet's Angel"????

Edited to add:

Also, it's important to post our thoughts regularly as main investigators read these forums regularly. They need to be made aware of the goings on.

Tricia is attributing that to Patsy - and I wonder what the big deal is? I can imagine myself dialing 911 and mumbling "Please, pick up." or "Hurry, hurry" or "Please let this be a dream." No matter what Patsy may have said before the transcript began - - I just don't see what difference it makes?

The BORG picks on the strangest things toget caught up with.

Ignore the disturbance at the window. Ignore the handwriting and the DNA. Ignore the stun gun and cord and tape that can't be linked to the parents. Ignore Lucy's story - which may or may not be related.

But let's go after Patsy for what can't be heard on a tape.

I wish the new investigators would clear those who can be cleared - including the Ramseys - based on the evidence.

What lab would want to get into this after determining that the end of the tape is "mayonnaise". Jameson was the first to say she thought she could hear "something" at the front end of the tape.

Go for it, Tricia! You might as well throw your dollars at another lab, too. You can get ANOTHER version of what is allegedly being said on the tape and "who" is presumably saying it. I anxiously await the deposition of your lab "expert" in the Fox News litigation. Did you tell them that would happen?

The relevance of any findings will be ZERO! Spinning a "hurry up (answer the phone)" or "omygawd" or "help me Jesus" into something incriminating is such a useless waste of time.

There are typing errors all over this forum and others. A sane person would say, "I think those are just typing errors". These idiots would say they were intentional or some subconscious choice and would spin accordingly. The same hold trues for 'slips' of the tongue (from Ramsey statements in interviews and television shows).

Lord, it's tiring. It's depressing too (to see human nature at its worst).

We have all heard the tape - the BORG still lies about what we all can hear.

Weren't we supposed to be hearing something dramatic from "the lab" a couple of weeks ago? It's been about seven months since the recordings were made available, if I've got my dates right. Based on my experience in hi-tech, seven months is a LOOOOOONNNNG time. It's actually longer than the time interval between successive product launches in some technical areas. It's 75% of an academic year.

If this so-called "lab" is reputable, they should have already reported their findings, even if those findings are negative --- unless they're doing it "for hire," which seems unlikely. They should say, "Here's what we did; these are the results; this is our interpretation." It seems to me that there is no such report; is that still correct as far as you (or anyone else) know?

Thanks for any information.

Copyright.

Thanks for your post on the other thread. I was wondering more about the recent claim that they were going to be looking at the recording on a particular weekend, two or more weeks ago. Either they didn't really look at it, or they didn't find anything and nobody wants to admit it, or ??? I was expecting to hear something about this monumental event. Honorable researchers would report, even if the findings were negative.