I would like to know how much money she made off the photos of JonBenét and her family after JonBenét's murder.

I would like to know why the photos weren't part of her Motherhood exhibit before the murder. Are they included now?

I would love to her her story of how her marriage ended, her relationships with tabloid reporters and her current relationship with Tom Miller - the man who went on trial for his part in the tabloid's attempt to buy the ransom note from Vacca. Is she really married to Tom now? Will that come in handy if he is sued for his upcoming book?

I wonder how her children are doing. And how they feel about their mother's involvement in the case. Have they followed all of this? If not, how old does she think they will be when they get on the Internet and do the research?

I would love to hear her explain her relationship with the Whites - has she spoken to them about the murder, the investigation, the Thomas suit?

Did Judith ever speak to Detective Linda Arndt? How did that work out?

Anyone else?

1 . "Leeches"
Posted by DonBradley on May-11-02 at 08:02 AM (EST)
Actual leeches have interesting medical and research uses; social leeches are far less interesting.

She made "a pretty penny" off this case.

2 . "I wonder"
Posted by Summer on May-11-02 at 04:21 PM (EST)
Doesnt she think the Ramseys are gulity?
I wonder why she got to that conclusion.. and why she took a picture of Patsy when she was
undergoing chemo , her first battle with chemo..when Patsy didnt want her to?

3 . "Summer"
Posted by jameson on May-12-02 at 08:52 PM (EST)
Patsy wrote about that in her book. She wasn't excited about doing it but Judith really wanted her to
and... Patsy has a hard time saying no to people - she is a very kind soul who wants to please.

4 . "Don't want to defend Judith (God Forbid!!)"
Posted by mousey on May-14-02 at 09:29 AM (EST)
But the pictures of Patsy were very dramatic and beautiful. She looked delicate and fragile, even
exotic in them--I can see why she wanted to photograph her. The pictures with JonBenet captured
the pathos, the bravery, and vulnerability of a woman facing such a life challenge and having
JonBenet in the picture underlined just how much holding onto life meant.

I do not think Judith should have published them without Patsy's consent, but they WERE very
affecting photos.

5 . "Artist"
Posted by jameson on May-14-02 at 07:52 PM (EST)
I can understand Judith wanting to take the photos and I also found some of them very touching. I
don't object to the photos - I object to how Judith used them after the murder.

6 . "Totally agree"
Posted by mousey on May-15-02 at 02:26 PM (EST)
I was just letting people that had not seen them know that they were not "photos of a sick woman".
I wanted to let them know that the photos were both beautiful and haunting and that publishing
them, especially in the interest of a Cancer-related charity perhaps, would normally be great.

THE WHOLE POINT WAS THAT PATSY WAS NOT COMFORTABLE WITH IT and therefore a real friend
would never have let them be published, especially for money for herself. Judith is the lowest of the
low, right down there with JonBenet's killer IMO.

7 . "does"
Posted by Summer on May-15-02 at 03:18 PM (EST)
Doesn anyone have any pictures Judith took of Patsy/JonBenet?

She barely even knew them and they didn't seem to really care much for her to begin with. They probably (and rightfully so) had bad vibes from this tabloid whore, aka LEECH.

But even a skanky bitch like this will not take away the beauty that little JonBenet brought to this world.

Here's to JonBenet Ramsey's memory on this Memorial Day!!!!!