Ethel
unregistered user
Dec-26-02, 05:12 PM (EST)

33. "RE: it was in their mind"
In response to message #31


Yeah! Jameson, the Ramsey believed so much an intruder monster had entered their house and taken
JonBenet that they got Fleet White to drive Burke to White's house and left him with virtual strangers
all day. Patsy did not even tell Burke good-bye that morning. This kid is woke up around 7:00 a.m. and
with no explanation he is told he is going to the White's house.

Mommy-dearest was too busy putting on an act to save her own a$$.

Tell you what. Why doesn't everyone that comes to this board stop posting and lets just see how
many hats Jameson can come up with to post under their names.

Leave Jameson to the dogs. It does not deserve any attention, and it surely does not know how to
speak the truth. One lie after another.

Let's not even read here. Let hir dry up on the vine, she has dug a hole, let her bury herself.

YOU can dictate to YOUR forum any way YOU see fit, but YOU cannot dictate to other forums.
You take great delight in copying and trashing the words form other forums, but it is very
obvious that you yourself CANNOT handle what it is that YOU UNFAIRLY FORCE UPON OTHERS!
You are little more than a CHILDISH, SELF-RIGHTEOUS, SPOILED BRAT and a SUPREME
HYPOCRITE!

“YOU ONLY REAP WHAT YOU SOW.”

You are entitled to your opinion and I am entitled to mine!
THIS IS MY OPINION AND EVEN YOU CAN’T TAKE IT AWAY FROM ME!!!!!

Cheers,
Orphan

Michael Kane - - will you tell us what you think now?

Serious question - - email me.

Remove | Alert | IP
Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

LMAO!
unregistered user
Dec-27-02, 10:06 PM (EST)

13. "RE: The evidence"
In response to message #12


email me...lol. Who do you think you are? An investigator? A part of this case? You're too much.

While you're selfgrandizing, Mr Kane is probably playing racketball, and planning a late supper with his
wife. I'd bet he doesn't read fiction, he's a busy man.

Remove | Alert | IP
Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

mike pane
unregistered user
Dec-27-02, 10:09 PM (EST)

14. "RE: The evidence"
In response to message #12


>bump
>
>Michael Kane - - will you tell us what you think now?
>
>Serious question - - email me.

oh yep right. Kane is really interested in corresponding with you. Like he's going to give you the time
of day. Just who in the hell do you think you are?? You really really think you are some sort of an
official in this case don't you? Like ANYONE has to, or wants to answer to you. Why don't you get
real.
If anyone is going to try to stick their nose in where it isn't wanted or instigate trouble for this new
investigation, it's you, Jams. Why don't you please do everyone in this case, especially the Ramseys, a
favor and stay the hell out of it.

Remove | Alert | IP
Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Candy Kane
unregistered user
Dec-27-02, 10:26 PM (EST)

15. "RE: The evidence"
In response to message #14


right Mike. Kane's sitting at his desk wringing his hands because Jameson has a question. Or maybe a
call came in while he was in a meeting, and he's going to email Jameson asap! Yea, he's hir puppet.
I agree she does the Ramsey Fam-i-ly no favor with hir forum. Makes them look guiltier, if that's
possible

Remove | Alert | IP
Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

mike pane
unregistered user
Dec-27-02, 10:32 PM (EST)

16. "RE: The evidence"
In response to message #15


>right Mike. Kane's sitting at his desk wringing his hands
>because Jameson has a question. Or maybe a call came in
>while he was in a meeting, and he's going to email Jameson
>asap! Yea, he's hir puppet.
>I agree she does the Ramsey Fam-i-ly no favor with hir
>forum. Makes them look guiltier, if that's possible

You are so right, Candy Kane! I see soooo many posters syaing the same thing about Jams turning
them against the Ramseys. I bet John and Patsy are so sorry and ashamed they EVER let her into their
world.

Remove | Alert | IP
Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

jameson
Charter Member
7602 posts
Dec-28-02, 02:47 PM (EST)

10. "RE: NOW"
In response to message #9


Not going to play DW/VD games here. I watched the trial, stated my opinion and that is another
forum. Not bringing that discussion here.

Remove | Alert | IP
Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

watcher
unregistered user
Dec-28-02, 02:50 PM (EST)

11. "RE: NOW"
In response to message #10


yes, you did Jameson. And, it's just that reasoning of yours that gives the police the right to call you
a CODE SIX WINGNUT. LOL

Remove | Alert | IP
Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

jameson
Charter Member
7602 posts
Dec-28-02, 02:58 PM (EST)

12. "RE: NOW"
In response to message #11


The police didn't call me that - - that was Donald Foster - - you know, the Vassar Professor Steve
Thomas said was "consigned to the DA's junk pile".

Get your flames straight.

The cop, Steve Thomas, called me an "Internet junkie".

Now, take your flames elsewhere.

Remove | Alert | IP
Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

watcher
unregistered user
Dec-28-02, 03:04 PM (EST)

13. "RE: NOW"
In response to message #12


what difference does it make? You're still barking mad, lololololol and you're still sticking your fat face
in business that doesn't concern you. Now, take your flame and shove it up your flat butt and fart you
ugly cow

Justify what you did anyway you want. You know deep down it was wrong. How you even have the
nerve to sign on to your computer is beyond me.

Use some of that money to get yourself a new face. I wouldn't show the one you have in public for
ALL the money in the world. It is truly a face(s) of a trader!!

You sicken me!!!!!!!!!!

My response:

Let's see....

Haddon, Morgan, Burke, Armistead, Williams, Schiller, Brennan, Thomas, Davis, Wecht, Singular, Von Dyke, Wallington, Dennin, Des Camps, Stobie, Smith, Walker, Hodges, Rubacker, Yeager, Foster, Kupperman, Van Tassel, Pitt, Stratbucker, Miller, Wong, Liebman, Epstein, Zieglar, Cunningham, Vacca, Thoma, Wise, Wood, Hill, Jenkins, Douglas, Gelb, Backster, Bardach, Boyles, Coffman, Densen-Gerber, Silverman, Simons, Phillips, Mills, Tracey, Keene-Osborne, Glick, Kane, Levin, Morrissey, Hoffman-Pugh, Toriello.....

THEY all made money from this case - - but that's OK.

I took money from the tabloids - - not from the Ramseys.

And I got out the TRUTH, not some spin.

I have NOTHING to be ashamed of.

The flames are stupid. Just green eyed monsters screaming, I think.

{b}I got this same threat in 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 and now 2003.

boring

Go ahead and delete this because I know you will anyway. Just take the cowards way out. You lie so
much Sue.

Disclaimer:This is only my opinion and the opinion of many others

Remove | Alert | IP
Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Snort
unregistered user
Feb-03-03, 11:51 AM (EST)

8. "out to pasture"
In response to message #7


Moooooooooooooooo