jameson
Charter Member
14249 posts |
Oct-26-02, 10:01 PM (EST) |
|
1. "On Cina Wong - he doesn't respect her cr"
In response to message #0
|
24 Do you understand that Ms. Wong is 25 your co-expert on handwriting in the case of 0032 1 Chris Wolf? Was that a smile captured just 2 then or an effort not to smile? 3 A. An effort not to smile. I don't 4 know what you mean by co- -- what was it you 5 said? 6 Q. My word was co-expert on handwriting 7 in the case of Chris Wolf. 8 A. I really don't know how to answer 9 that question, to tell you the truth, because I 10 was not aware until this morning on my way here 11 that she had, in fact, been deposed and that 12 she had, in fact, written another report. 13 MR. HOFFMAN: Jim, can I interject 14 here, because this is a thing that involves 15 counsel and you can put this on the record or 16 keep it off, whichever you like. 17 MR. RAWLS: Well, Darnay, first I'd 18 like for Mr. Epstein to finish his answer. I 19 didn't think he was finished, but he might have 20 been. 21 MR. HOFFMAN: I'm very sorry. 22 Q. Mr. Epstein. 23 A. I don't consider her as my co-expert 24 in this case. 25 Q. Why is that? 0033 1 A. Someone else may consider her as a 2 co-expert in this case, but I don't. 3 Q. Why? 4 A. Because I don't believe that she 5 meets what I and the profession consider to be 6 the necessary qualifications for forensic 7 document examination. 8 Q. Mr. Epstein, I don't either. 9 MR. RAWLS: Darnay, if this is when 10 you would like to make your remark, please feel 11 free to do so. 12 MR. HOFFMAN: Yeah. One of the 13 things that I was most concerned about with 14 respect to both Cina and Gideon was that there 15 would be no opportunity for either person to 16 really be able to comment on the work of the 17 other individual, on the theory that keeping the 18 handwriting experts from knowing about the work 19 of the other person could lead to truthful 20 answers that, in fact, they were not influenced 21 in any way by the work being done by the other 22 person. So that was really the reason. 23 MR. RAWLS: Thank you. Darnay, are 24 you finished? 25 MR. HOFFMAN: Yes, Jim, thank you.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 18 Q. -- but it is your view under your 19 understanding of the Daubert test, and given 20 your knowledge, your education, your expertise, 21 your training and your experience as a 22 board-certified document examiner, that Cina Wong 23 is not qualified under Daubert to render an 24 opinion about authorship of the ransom note at 25 issue in this case; correct? 0168 1 A. I would say that's correct. |
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|