jameson's Links  Terms of Service  News  Chat  Forum Archives  Cord Photos  Email  

jameson's WebbSleuths

Subject: "" Archived thread - Read only
 
  Previous Topic | Next Topic
Printer-friendly copy    
Conferences old JBR threads Topic #24
Reading Topic #24

Charter Member
Dec--, 00: AM (EST)
Click to EMail Click to send private message to Click to add this user to your buddy list  
. ""
In response to message #
 
  


  Printer-friendly page | Top

 
Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic
DonBradley
Charter Member
2313 posts
Apr-14-02, 03:50 PM (EST)
Click to EMail DonBradley Click to send private message to DonBradley Click to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "Walks on Water"
In response to message #0
 
   Some seem to think Steve Thomas walks on water.

He was a very inexperienced cop whose career had mainly consisted of narcotics busts which are not really much of an investigative challenge.

He apparently was being eased out of the department anyway, so he had little to lose by making use of the files to concoct a book that would sell rather than a truthful rendition.

Believe him? No. Not I.


  Printer-friendly page | Top
jamesonadmin
Charter Member
14249 posts
Apr-14-02, 05:04 PM (EST)
Click to EMail jameson Click to send private message to jameson Click to add this user to your buddy list  
2. "to ST's Angel"
In response to message #1
 
   I just got a letter from someone claiming to be ST's Angel - I responded but the mail was returned as the address was bad.

The name of the email was "How dare you !!!" and she was very upset that I am not talking nice about Steve Thomas or opening the forum for public flaming.

This is the response she didn't get:


Steve Thomas wrote a book that stated his theory - he said he would defend it in court - he got people like you to send him money so he could tell the truth and prove his case... and he bailed before he was deposed.

The Ramseys let the case end rather than see it carried out for YEARS. Thomas and the publishers paid the Ramseys for the naughty they did and you think that makes the Ramseys look bad?

Give me a break!

Steve Thomas walked away from JonBenét on the day he resigned. I don't know of one other thing he did to honestly bring her killer to justice. You worship the ground he walks on - - that's YOUR problem, not mine.

You have other forums to post on - - I haven't seen much from you. You want to post on my forum? Join. Own your words like the rest of us.

jameson


  Printer-friendly page | Top
jamesonadmin
Charter Member
14249 posts
Apr-14-02, 08:08 PM (EST)
Click to EMail jameson Click to send private message to jameson Click to add this user to your buddy list  
3. "http://www.thedailycamera.com/extra/ramsey/2000/03arams.html"
In response to message #2
 
   Thomas plans for day in court

By Christopher Anderson
Camera Staff Writer


A former Boulder police detective being sued for defamation by John and
Patsy Ramsey has retained the attorney who won a wrongful death civil
suit against O.J. Simpson.
Steve Thomas said Monday he has retained the services of Daniel
Petrocelli and said he looks forward to the opportunity to "expose in a
court of law what happened in the Ramsey home" the night the couple's
daughter, JonBenét, was killed.
Petrocelli, a trial lawyer who works for the Los Angeles law firm of
O'Melveny & Myers, represented Fred Goldman in a $33.5 million
wrongful-death judgment against Simpson, who was acquitted in criminal
court of killing his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman.
On Thursday, the Ramseys filed an $80 million libel and slander lawsuit
against Thomas, a publishing company, and unidentified Boulder police
officers, among others. The suit was filed in U.S. District Court in Atlanta.
The couple's suit against Thomas alleges that his book, "JonBenét: Inside
the Ramsey Murder Investigation," and subsequent media interviews on
the case falsely accused Patsy Ramsey of killing her child and John
Ramsey of participating in the cover-up. The book was published April 10
of last year.
"I stand by my convictions," Thomas said in a statement Monday, the first
since the lawsuit was filed. "The Ramseys have no right to silence me or
anyone else who wishes to seek the truth and speak out about this
horrible tragedy of injustice."
Thomas has established a hotline for supporters to donate to his legal
defense. The fund is being run through Wise Communications, a Los
Angeles public relations firm.
Thomas was among the first detectives to formally interrogate the
Ramseys about the death of their daughter.
He resigned from the department Aug. 6, 1998, on what would have been
the little girl's 8th birthday.
In his resignation letter, Thomas expressed frustration that the Boulder
County District Attorney's Office was preventing a criminal case against
the couple from moving forward.
JonBenét, 6, was found beaten and strangled in her family's basement
home Dec. 26, 1996.
John and Patsy Ramsey have remained under police suspicion, although
the couple has repeatedly denied killing JonBenét.
In his first comments on the lawsuit, Boulder Police Chief Mark Beckner
said he is not aware of anyone providing Thomas with information for the
book.
"Our position is it's not our issue," he said. "It's between Steve Thomas
and the Ramseys."
The Ramseys' attorney, Lin Wood, says the proof that officers helped with
the book lies within Thomas' own author's note, which mentions
"confidences."
The note reads: "To certain members of the Boulder Police Department,
cops who still cannot speak out publicly and who know this story too well,
I appreciate your continued support and the confidences you provided me
in the presentation of this book."
The lawsuit refers to the unnamed officers as "John Doe" 1, 2 and 3, and
"Jane Doe" 1. Wood hopes to prove who the officers are as part of
discovery in the case.
Wood said he is fully aware the lawsuit gives Thomas the opportunity to
question the Ramseys under oath and seek other information.
But he said the couple is not afraid to take the case in front of a jury,
saying they have "the courage of their innocence."
Contact Christopher Anderson at (303) 473-1355 or
andersonc@thedailycamera.com.
Camera wire services contributed to this report.
April 3, 2001

First I want to say I miss Chris Anderson a lot. We were friends. When I went to Boulder he would meet with me and we would sit and talk - he had a contageous smile, a great laugh. He was a very nice guy, he was respected in life, and missed now that he is gone.

Then I want to say that I think he would have laughed when he learned about the lawsuit being settled. The Ramseys were deposed in Wolf - - their depositions were released unredacted. When Steve Thomas was to be deposed in Wolf he fought it - - hard. He did NOT want to talk - - but he found he had to - - and now he is fighting to keep that document sealed so no one will know just how bad it was.

The Ramseys were ready to be deposed again - this time by Thomas' attorneys. And Thomas was going to have to face Lin Wolf again.

AND HE BLOCKED IT - He and his publishers offered the Ramseys a settlement they couldn't refuse.

They could have held out for more - - dragged it out for years - - but this is fine. We all know that Steve Thomas was a liar - - not willing to go to court to prove his theory. He just wanted to have his theory out there. And we all know that the evidence does not prove his theory - - just the opposite, it discredits Steve Thomas totally.


  Printer-friendly page | Top
KitKat
Charter Member
Apr-15-02, 00:25 AM (EST)
Click to EMail KitKat Click to send private message to KitKat Click to add this user to your buddy list  
5. "ST's Angel "
In response to message #2
 
   Where oh where is she now? Has she retired from public life as ST's spokeswoman?
I wonder if she was getting paid by the keystroke?
Sure would explain all the ????? and !!!!!! and Hahahahahahahaha's.


  Printer-friendly page | Top
LovelyPigeon
Charter Member
Apr-14-02, 08:56 PM (EST)
Click to EMail LovelyPigeon Click to send private message to LovelyPigeon Click to add this user to your buddy list  
4. "Heck"
In response to message #0
 
   no!


  Printer-friendly page | Top
Lilac
Charter Member
Apr-15-02, 01:07 AM (EST)
Click to EMail Lilac Click to send private message to Lilac Click to add this user to your buddy list  
6. "Jameson's booboo"
In response to message #4
 
   LAST EDITED ON Apr-15-02 AT 01:08 AM (EST)

Jameson,

I see in your above post that you misspelled the word "sucker" as in ST's Sucker -- why did you spell it A-N-G-E-L?

(wink)


  Printer-friendly page | Top
paperdoll
Charter Member
Apr-15-02, 06:19 AM (EST)
Click to EMail paperdoll Click to send private message to paperdoll Click to add this user to your buddy list  
7. "just curious"
In response to message #6
 
   what happened to Chris Anderson? Deceased or went to another newspaper?


  Printer-friendly page | Top
Miranda
Member since Jan-20-07
Apr-15-02, 07:31 AM (EST)
Click to EMail Miranda Click to send private message to Miranda Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
8. "Chris Anderson"
In response to message #7
 
   >what happened to Chris Anderson? Deceased or
>went to another newspaper?

He and his girlfriend were struck by lightening on a vacation to Florida. He died and his girlfriend survived.



  Printer-friendly page | Top
paperdoll
Charter Member
Apr-15-02, 08:40 AM (EST)
Click to EMail paperdoll Click to send private message to paperdoll Click to add this user to your buddy list  
9. "How awful!"
In response to message #8
 
   Thanks you for responding.


  Printer-friendly page | Top
Jarbo9
Charter Member
Apr-15-02, 10:35 AM (EST)
Click to EMail Jarbo9 Click to send private message to Jarbo9 Click to add this user to your buddy list  
10. ""Should Thomas be believed?""
In response to message #9
 
   Steve Thomas repeated over and over again pointless
issues such as whether or not Burke came downstairs
during the 911 call. He never even tries to explain
why such a denial would be strategically advantageous
to the the Ramseys.

An example of nonsense repeated throughout his book
is the statement that John and Fleet searched the
home starting in the basement. Linda Arndt had
used the common phrase "from top to bottom".
Thomas took the statement literally.

Thomas totally ignored experts that disagreed with
his scenario. At his presentation of the evidence
he thought pointed to Patsy, he only quoted the
opinion of Don Foster as to whom authored the
ransom note. He had contrary expert analysis
from nothing less than the Secret Service, but
never mentioned it.

He never understood that an
intruder could use the tools of the crime
(Paper, pen, garrote handle) as well as a
family member. It's no wonder Alex Hunter
never gave his opinions any credence.

Thomas was a detective with no experience
investigating a homicide. Reading his book
was worth the effort. You learn just how
mediocre he was as an investigator.


  Printer-friendly page | Top
jamesonadmin
Charter Member
14249 posts
Apr-15-02, 10:55 AM (EST)
Click to EMail jameson Click to send private message to jameson Click to add this user to your buddy list  
11. "Thomas knew"
In response to message #10
 
   Thomas knew what Burke had told the police - - he knew damn well that Burke was NOT on the first floor when the 911 call was made - - the child's voice simply was NOT on that tape.

I think he would have been forced to admit that in his deposition or on the stand in the Wolf trial - - or his own.

He settled his own suit - - won't have to testify there - - and I feel sure he will simply be in Germany and unavailable to testify inthe Wolf suit. But his deposition will be available in that case - - so unless Darnay Hoffman drops that suit, I think some more of the truth will come out.


  Printer-friendly page | Top
KitKat
Charter Member
Apr-15-02, 05:46 PM (EST)
Click to EMail KitKat Click to send private message to KitKat Click to add this user to your buddy list  
12. "what if?"
In response to message #11
 
   What if the Wolf suit gets tossed like the LHP suit?

Can Lin Wood make release of ST's Chris Wolf suit depo part of the settlement in the Thomas suit?

I know the two cases are separate and one (the Wolf suit) hasn't been tried, but theoretically speaking, Steve Thomas could have allowed his deposition to be released. We *heard* he lied his b*tt off and that's why he fought to keep it sealed.

IMO his credibility is shot, which makes this depo worth something to me. Since he doesn't have sufficient money to pay the piper, isn't it fair of Wood to ask him to pay in the only currency Thomas has left - his lies under oath in the Wolf suit?


  Printer-friendly page | Top
jamesonadmin
Charter Member
14249 posts
Apr-11-02, 10:00 AM (EST)
Click to EMail jameson Click to send private message to jameson Click to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "another option"
In response to message #0
 
   Hi,Jams
Just thought you should know that a pelvic ultrasound is MUCH more
definitive for any type of uterine or ovarian tumor.
It is easy enough to get a doc to order a pelvic ultrasound, just tell
him you have pelvic pain or abnormal bleeding or something similar and
mention that you would like a diagnostic pelvic ultrasound. The scan is
VERY sensitive now, and they use a small vaginal wand which allows them
to map an ovary like it is a city block. It doesn't hurt, insurance
covers it, and there ISN' says with certainty that they don't, others point to John
Ramsey's involvement with high-tech industry to support the theory that he
does.

The online sleuths have lots of theories. Lauren Stewart of Michigan (code
name: shorty), who plans to make it to Boulder, says there's a feeling of mental
superiority among the electronic detectives. According to Stewart, who has two
grown children and three adopted school-age kids at home, "Everyone's trying
to be the one guy who spots the one thing that everyone's missed." Stewart, for
example, noticed that Patsy had said that JonBenet's bedroom door was
closed--but how could the murderer have closed the bedroom door behind him,
since he would have had to carry an armload of other materials along with the
child to the basement? Stewart wasn't sure if this seeming inconsistency meant
anything, but just in case, she e-mailed the tip to new Boulder police chief Mark
Beckner, who was put in charge of the investigation last fall.

The Anti-Rams and Fence Sitters revel in these little details and complain that
the Pro-Rams won't even consider them. Too often, Wheeler says, it seems
that the Pro-Rams just try to start conflict without making a well-reasoned point
about the case itself.

Although the Pro-Rams won't be attending Boulder's wingding, several key
media figures have been invited to a dinner. One prominent figure, former chief
deputy Denver district attorney and current Channel 7 legal-expert-for-hire
Craig Silverman, decided to invite himself, Knapp says. She's happy to have
him. "It was like, 'Wow! He's already on my list.'"

Who's not on her list? University of Colorado professor Michael Tracy, who
made a documentary on the Ramseys that Channel 9 aired earlier this summer
and that is slated to run on A&E sometime this fall. Originally, Knapp thought it
would be a good idea to ask him, just to stir things up a bit. But the idea was
roundly rejected by the online pals she surveyed. "Some felt that he would be a
spy for the Ramseys," she says, then adds, "Others think he's not very
intelligent. He seems to be very ignorant of a lot of things. I don't know if that's
by choice."

The dinner, initially planned for Pasta Jay's, was moved to an undisclosed
location for two reasons: First, the number of attendees quickly grew larger
than expected. And then some cyber-sleuths had second thoughts about holding
their gathering at a restaurant owned by rabid Ramsey supporter Jay Elowsky,
who once went after two people he thought were members of the media.
"Some people are frightened to be too visual," says Stewart. "I mean, that Pasta
Jay guy took after somebody with a baseball bat." Now attendees will be issued
passwords to gain access to the dinner.

In addition to meeting over dinner, the armchair detectives can take a
sight-seeing tour of Boulder, working off a list of suggested sights compiled by
Knapp (see page 20). Of course, there's the former Ramsey home, where
JonBenet's body was found. (Knapp is quick to point out that this will not be an
organized bus tour and says her group will be respectful of neighbors.) They
also plan to visit the Boulder County Jail (current home of minor player J.T.
Colfax, arrested last year after he stuffed a burning envelope through the mail
slot of the Ramsey home; he also lifted the morgue log sheet listing JonBenet's
body), McGuckin Hardware (possible source of the rope used in the garrotte),
Boulder County Courthouse, the Boulder Police Department, High Plains
Elementary and Access Graphics. A trip to Rollinsville, the hometown of Bill
"Santa" McReynolds, is also on the itinerary for those interested in attending.

Perhaps the oddest stop on the tour is the Columbia Cemetery gravesite of Tom
Horn, executed in Cheyenne in 1903 for murdering a fourteen-year-old boy.
This past July, authorities found a note attached to Horn's grave addressed to
Boulder District Attorney Alex Hunter, threatening to damage the grave if the
Ramseys were not arrested. The group also wants to pose at the Web cam in
front of University Bikes and wave a hello to all the other online buddies who
couldn't make the trip.

The cyber-sleuths are also planning their very own whodunit murder mystery
game--but one that doesn't involve the facts of the Ramsey case. That would
be too tacky. And as a surprise, Knapp plans to have goodie bags waiting for all
the attendees. She doesn't want to reveal too much about their contents, but
they are certain to contain FBI pens, funny disguises and other stuff any good
detective needs.

Each bag will also hold a T-shirt with a message for JonBenet Ramsey's killer,
printed in lettering that mimics the ransom note: "Listen Carefully! The Internet
Is Watching!

westword.com &pip; originally published: September 10, 1998


  Printer-friendly page | Top
jamesonadmin
Charter Member
14249 posts
Apr-11-02, 01:59 PM (EST)
Click to EMail jameson Click to send private message to jameson Click to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "Ahhhh"
In response to message #0
 
   what a memory.

I remember being slightly upset at the story - the writer didn't portray me correctly, I thought - but all in all - - it's an interesting blast from the past.


  Printer-friendly page | Top
jamesonadmin
Charter Member
14249 posts
Apr-09-02, 05:42 PM (EST)
Click to EMail jameson Click to send private message to jameson Click to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "My page on the books"
In response to message #0
 
   http://www.jameson245.com/books.htm


  Printer-friendly page | Top
tipper
Charter Member
Apr-09-02, 07:18 PM (EST)
Click to EMail tipper Click to send private message to tipper Click to add this user to your buddy list  
2. "I vote the tabs"
In response to message #1
 
   will be LHPs next roosting spot. As you say she won't find a publisher. Vanity requires you have some sort of $$$ to start with. I think she'll take the money from the tabs (a bird in the hand...)and we'll have one more big splashy cover on What Really Went on Inside the Grand Jury? LHP Was There And Tells ALL!!!


  Printer-friendly page | Top
KitKat
Charter Member
Apr-09-02, 11:49 PM (EST)
Click to EMail KitKat Click to send private message to KitKat Click to add this user to your buddy list  
3. "tipper"
In response to message #2
 
   You're probably right. IMO, Hoffman used her (and Chris Wolf) for his own ends. Settling the Thomas suit was a big win, but this one was just a nuisance suit all along. Still, it's good to know it's over. Pop the bubbly!


  Printer-friendly page | Top
jamesonadmin
Charter Member
14249 posts
Apr-01-02, 09:20 AM (EST)
Click to EMail jameson Click to send private message to jameson Click to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "The cord"
In response to message #0
 
   I have some of it - - it is flat and feels almost waxed - like those slippery shoelaces that don't stay tied.

Why that cord as opposed to twine? If the person was using a slip knot, it would be more effective.

This person knew exactly what he was doing - he chose his tools carefully.


  Printer-friendly page | Top
DonBradley
Charter Member
2313 posts
Apr-01-02, 10:20 AM (EST)
Click to EMail DonBradley Click to send private message to DonBradley Click to add this user to your buddy list  
2. "Precisely."
In response to message #1
 
   >This person knew exactly what he was
>doing - he chose his tools carefully.
Yes. I think so.
A circular cord would have slid up and down the neck and the force that was applied would be not only diminished but dissipated erratically.

This guy really knew what he was doing.

Unfortunately, its a bit like the Prosecutor's Nightmare when it comes to hate crimes: If a white man attacks a minority taken from a large crowd, the prosecutor can allege that it was a hate crime of some sort; whereas if a minority attacks one white person from a large crowd,,the allegation of 'hate crime' can be countered with 'selected a victim randomly' and chances favored the white person due to there having been fewer minorities.

So in cord selection, we are left with several alternatives:

Was it merely something lying around which turned out to be the best thing to use? Or was it simply picked by chance from among a wide variety of cords being sold? Or was it knowingly and carefully selected for its purpose?

The cord is sold at various Army/Navy Surplus stores and outdoor outfitter type stores. It is not some very rare item at all.

Rock climbing? Camping? Sailing? Equipment Stowage, such as in a Marina? Skydiving? Rescue work? Movie set construction? Displays and Exhibitions?(such as would also use duct tape).



  Printer-friendly page | Top
Maikai
Charter Member
1558 posts
Apr-01-02, 11:28 PM (EST)
Click to EMail Maikai Click to send private message to Maikai Click to add this user to your buddy list  
3. "Garrotting has been used "
In response to message #2
 
   before in rape cases for control---by sickos that bring the victim in and out of consciousness....some have used it to kill. I think the guy knew what he was doing in that department---I don't necessarily think murder was the intent in the beginning. However, it is possible the crime was done in retaliation against JR for some perceived injury. Aspects of the crime show anger-retaliation--just difficult, IMO, to determine who the anger was directed at, or where it came from.


  Printer-friendly page | Top
DonBradley
Charter Member
2313 posts
Apr-02-02, 12:15 PM (EST)
Click to EMail DonBradley Click to send private message to DonBradley Click to add this user to your buddy list  
4. "Thematic Anger"
In response to message #3
 
   Anger can be 'thematic' rather than having resulted from any personal interaction that took place on a prior occasion.

The examples I've used before: a sniper shooting an abortionist and a total nutcase who is enraged by JonBenet having been permitted to step on a sidewalk crack, do not in any way require some sort of "personal" grudge. The anger arises more from political issues than personal interaction.


  Printer-friendly page | Top
Joyce
Charter Member
Apr-03-02, 11:14 AM (EST)
Click to EMail Joyce Click to send private message to Joyce Click to add this user to your buddy list  
5. "That's actually"
In response to message #4
 
   >Anger can be 'thematic' rather than having
>resulted from any personal interaction that
>took place on a prior occasion.
>
>The examples I've used before: a sniper
>shooting an abortionist and a total
>nutcase who is enraged by JonBenet
>having been permitted to step on
>a sidewalk crack, do not in
>any way require some sort of
>"personal" grudge. The anger arises more
>from political issues than personal interaction.

what I thought it was. Someone I used to know told me something once (when I didn't even ask - as I said before, I've been told things by others when I was just sitting and listening that perhaps they didn't even remember telling me later). Anyway, this guy told me he used to be a 'massagenest' (sp) (woman hater) but that he tried to get out of that by looking at little girls because "they were so pure" and all of that, and it occured to me that if this was him, that he could've seen JBR's image in the pagents as 'soiling' that 'pure' image of little girls.

I wrote to someone about my all of that long ago so this is just bringing some of it out into the open here.

IMO I can't see anyone as 'pure as the driven snow' but then I've lived longer than twenty years so that is why. Wont say how much longer, but longer.


  Printer-friendly page | Top
DonBradley
Charter Member
2313 posts
Apr-04-02, 10:51 PM (EST)
Click to EMail DonBradley Click to send private message to DonBradley Click to add this user to your buddy list  
6. "Snow?"
In response to message #5
 
   >I can't see anyone as 'pure as the driven snow'
Most are as pure as the driven slush.



  Printer-friendly page | Top
jamesonadmin
Charter Member
14249 posts
Oct-29-02, 11:13 AM (EST)
Click to EMail jameson Click to send private message to jameson Click to add this user to your buddy list  
7. "The cord"
In response to message #6
 
   I think it is right to note that the cord matched NOTHING in the Ramsey house and was never linked to the Ramseys at all.

It would appear the tape and cord and other things (rope, stun gun, Hi-Tec Boots)were carried into the house by the killer. That tells a lot about him - - and someone out in Boulder must have had some idea that this guy was involved - - his personality and things he owned... maybe things that went missing after the murder.


  Printer-friendly page | Top

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic