Recent posts from earlier thread.

Ashley
May-26-03, 06:10 PM (EST)
48. "RE: post #37"
In response to message #47

No, I have no unnamed sources. Everything I post you've had access to as well.
I can't be the only one that heard Priscilla didn't like the Barbie nightgown! But maybe it wasn't true. If jams didn't hear it, then i'm guessing it must not be.
And you're right, I shouldn't have put it out there, like it's a fact. Now, I'm not sure it is!
See, I'll admit when I may be wrong.

Ashley
May-26-03, 06:14 PM (EST)
49. "RE: post #37"
In response to message #48
What I heard about the nightgown jams, was NOT that she didn't approve of it, she didn't like it. Don't know why!
I believe Nedra was the source for this. But this was aloooong time ago. My memeory is fading. Either Pam or Nedra. Ask Patsy about it.

Smokey
May-26-03, 06:15 PM (EST)
50. "Linda Arndt on Priscilla"
In response to message #48
During Linda's civil lawsuit against the BPD, she gave a deposition in which she said she had seen Priscilla several times while walking or jogging after the murder.
Was she uncomfortable with that contact? I got that impression.
Can anyone repost that part of her deposition, if they have it.

Do a search for Linda Arndt on the forums, check the archives too - - you should find plenty. But there is more I never saw.

I hoped Jann might have it but now I think not.

I am sure they were interviewed, but how aggressive were the questions?

I hope the new investigators follow up on that more - - do a quick check for handwriting and DNA - - why not?

>I hope the new investigators follow up on that more - -
>do a quick check for handwriting and DNA - - why not?
Can't hurt, can't take too long or require much effort.

Though these guests were clearly adult males and don't you think an adult male could carry a 45 pound girl down a flight of stairs without dragging her head along the garland-strewn railing?

From that one could infer they were planning on committing a crime, if not killing her. At the very least, it could mean whoever took her downstairs intended to leave her in the house.

IF this is viewed as a sex crime, the 'prime' age range is mid-teen to early twenties, but you know that I don't really view it as a sex-crime or an intended kidnapping that somehow unravelled into murder.

I do however wonder how an adult male who probably wrapped up a sleeping six year old girl in the bedding could not carry his less than fifty pound burden down a flight of stairs without bonking her head into something. Ofcourse he would not be concerned with leaving debris in her hair, but he would be concerned with the noise of the contact and any resultant awakening or attempt to cry out.

I surely see indications of an older individual from the note's text and I don't know if this garland in the hair should be given much weight or not. But if a fifty pound burden is unmanageable for him, then it seems strange.

Can it be said that only an intruder who planned to leave her behind would carry her downstairs sideways, if there is no match for the bannister garland in the basement room?

LOU SMIT - We're fairly certain that JonBenét was taken from her room down this spiral staircase. There was garland on the railing of the spiral staircase and there was also garland found in the hair and on the clothing of JonBenét.
- - - - -
He does not say there was no matching garland in the basement, but why would he be "fairly certain she was taken down the spiral stairs" if there was similar garland in the basement room?

Sorry this is getting off topic for the Guests.

They looked odd and out of place and one of them that i remember, I believe he wore glasses, was scary looking.

He just didn't look like he belonged in the picture.

No offense to the little whites...but they looked like "Children of the Corn", compared to JB and Burke. The image was just creepy.

"No offence" Ashley, but it takes an incredibly nasty person to say a thing like that.

Impressions may not be entirely reliable, but that does not mean that they should be ignored. I will admit, however, that although I don't know what "children of the corn" refers to, I doubt those children wrote the note or left the male dna.

Children of the corn is a book by Stephen King. It's about creepy children - kind of Midwich Cuckoos type thing. IMO, a very spiteful and unecessary comment about a couple of innocent children.

None of those shown are the guests from CA. The men in the photo are - in no specific order to protect their privacy... Joe Barnhill, Priscilla's father, Larry Barber, John Fernie, Don Paugh and Fleet White.

Do you have another photo that does show the CA company? I have not seen one on the Internet.

I didn't know who the men were in that photo, but Ashley made her post with her normal flourish of conviction and she does present herself as something of an authority on the Whites and their guests. There are four bespectacled gentlemen in the photo. Not sure which one is supposed to be the creepy looking one. They all look pretty ordinary to me.

I really don't want misinformation on the forum - - so please respond here or in email.

So please correct me if I'm wrong.

The Children of the Corn are not ugly children, that's not what I meant. I meant Eeerie.

Who are these people jams in the picture, if you can tell me? I'm rather relieved to hear this...it's not what I thought the Calif. men to look like.

But it's true I don't have access to any of these things. Just what I see here.

The guest list is on-line as well - - we all know who was there.

As far as I know, there are no photos out there of the men from CA.

It really is a bad photo and hard to see what anyone really looks like.

Members can log in, edit posts .... and they take legal responsibility for posts done using their screen name (so they are far less likely to find a post deleted)

We believe it makes people post more responsibly - - and being logged in DOES make a poster a bit more credible because others KNOW the person is taking responsibility for their posts - not playing games often found when posters are anonymous and looking for trouble.