VIDEO TECHNICIAN: The time is 6:23. We're going on the record.

Q. (BY MR. WOOD) Mr. Thomas, in terms of the search of the Ramseys' hard drive and their
computer, was anything found that was viewed as suspicious or incriminating in August?

A. There were, I think reams of documents that came off that recovered hard drive, but I think as
far as, I don't knowif the search included pornography, I think it did, nothing like that, but there was
other documents that were later used for Foster. But I --

Q. For handwriting analysis, I'm talking about beyond use for analysis of handwriting, anything --

A. You mean suspicious?

Q. Or incriminating?

A. I would have to flip back through it.

Q. Anything that jumps out at you as we sit here today?

A. No.

Q. And certainly there is never any finding despite a fairly extensive search that in any way linked
the Ramseys to any type of pornography; am I right about that?

A. Not that I'm aware of.

No kiddie porn--not even adult porn.

They should try looking at Fleet's computers...or maybe the library computers... or maybe other computers...

They should look at the computers and movie libraries of ALL reasonable suspects who can't be cleared by DNA and handwriting.

The question was - - was there anything suspicious or incriminating on the Ramsey computer. Thomas said he knew of no links to porn BUT made sure that he got it in that documents from the computer went to Don Foster for HIS "work". (quotes are mine)

Looks like the bottom line is that the investigation found nothing suspicious or incriminating on the Ramsey computer.

We also know there was nothing in their books or movies or behavior.... no one found any link between the Ramseys and anything related to the crime - - no stun gun, no garrotes, no bondage, no sex crime, no acts of violence....