SPADE & TRICIA'S CHANCE TO BE HEROES!

Since Spade and Tricia seem to work tirelessly to find attention for their ill conceived theories and poorly done science projects...NOW IS THE TIME FOR THEM TO TAKE LIN WOOD'S CHALLENGE! If their work is so damn important let's see if they have the guts to take him.

Wood, who on Tuesday filed a defamation suit against Fox News, says Griffith's statements are absolutely and unequivocally false. The tape is a genuine representation of Patsy Ramsey's distress and further proves that none of the Ramseys was involved in JonBenet's murder, Wood said. I challenge anyone who says to the contrary to publicly release their recording and the full report of any so-called expert who claims to hear Burke and John on the tape, Wood said. I will be more than happy to take the sworn testimony of any such individual as part of the Ramsey v. Fox News litigation and prove that person upon cross-examination to be a fraud.

>SPADE & TRICIA'S CHANCE TO BE HEROES!
>
This should be good! The sleazy spinners of FFJ are lining up to be deposed by the most sucessful defamation attorney in the USA. I predict a new high in Ramsey case irritainment.

Trish and Spade will not be taking Lin up on his offer - I guarantee it.

Trish's statement to the paper was just BORG ranting, not to be taken seriously at all. Anyone reading the forums knows that when she first got the 911 tape she posted that she just heard typing - - it was later that she swore she had lied - that all along she heard Patsy's voice. Not Burke's voice but Patsy's. And not that has become twisted into evidence that Burke was in the room and not asleep... Just BORG idiocy.

I just noticed that Spade has made another threat. This time it's directed at Candy.

Only thugs make this kind of threat. Why does he care what Candy has to say? He loves to suggest he's all hooked up and all imporant. Fact is, he's simply a thug with science projects, lies and veiled threats in his little wimpy toolbox.

It takes a lot of nerve for someone like Spade to make reference to the KARMA TRAIN. I'd say his is long overdue!

The fools at FFJ should be thankful Lin Wood is not suing them for defamation. The thread titled "Listen To Patsy Ramsey's 911 Call. Hear the Truth. Lin Wood Lied." goes beyond stating an opinion. Tricia's contacts with the media would lead an ordinary person to think she is an expert on the case. I hope Lin Wood asks the so-called experts at FFJ to put their money where their mouth is.

Tricia's contacts with the media are flimsy at best. Any intelligent person, or member of the media, who takes a trip to FFJ, sees immediately what kind of people post there! The hatred, personal attacks and threats are very evident. Not to mention their 911 crap!

I don't dispute your observations, but you are giving FFJ a break they don't deserve by minimizing their constant defamatatory attacks as nothing more than the rantings of a collection of ill-tempered, misinformed, egotistical blowhards. As long as they publish their findings as facts, couched in pseudo-scientific mumbo-jumbo, and communicate their intentions to "make a difference" - they are as offensive as the Holocaust denial websites. I look at FFJ as a hate site, nothing more.

LAST EDITED ON Dec-29-03 AT 09:10 PM (EST)
 
I'm wondering how long some of those thread titles will remain up. Slanderous, if you ask me (and no one is!). I did notice that a couple of posts from one thread disappeared 'overnight'. I tend to agree with your assessment, Smokey. As a newbie to that site, I was shocked at its content. As time has passed, I have become less sensitive. Mame is right, however, anyone who has half a brain can see that the place is full of hate and questionable 'information'. The threatening post against Candy is despicable.

LAST EDITED ON Dec-29-03 AT 09:39 PM (EST)
 
That's how Spade works. He once found out where a poster lived, looked up the backgrounds on neighbors of a poster. He dribbled info about the neighbor's job and address. All in an effort to intimidate and cause fear.

I won't quit posting about the case or about him...his involvement is far too questionable and his character is far too dark to look the other way.

Yes, what he posted about Candy is outrageous! And Tricia calls him "Jonbenet's Angel"????

Edited to add:

Also, it's important to post our thoughts regularly as main investigators read these forums regularly. They need to be made aware of the goings on.

Tricia is now saying Patsy said something on the tape before the transcript began. I listened to the "enhanced" tape she is offering and there is something on that tape - don't know if it was there before Tricia got it or if she and her friends added it - but I do hear something. No distinct words, but more than a moan.

Tricia is attributing that to Patsy - and I wonder what the big deal is? I can imagine myself dialing 911 and mumbling "Please, pick up." or "Hurry, hurry" or "Please let this be a dream." No matter what Patsy may have said before the transcript began - - I just don't see what difference it makes?

The BORG picks on the strangest things toget caught up with.

Ignore the disturbance at the window. Ignore the handwriting and the DNA. Ignore the stun gun and cord and tape that can't be linked to the parents. Ignore Lucy's story - which may or may not be related.

But let's go after Patsy for what can't be heard on a tape.

I wish the new investigators would clear those who can be cleared - including the Ramseys - based on the evidence.

Well according to posters the dna is at the point that it can clear suspects.
Let me quote the BPD from the 48 hours transcrips about Oliva.Boulder police dismissed Oliva because his DNA doesn't match evidence at the scene. The Ramseys say police have a double standard : While some suspects have been cleared because their DNA doesn't match. They "Ramseys" have not been cleared for the same reason.
My point, how can they clear Oliva or anyone else on DNA if they can't clear Ramseys?
I want to know for once and all do they have the DNA are not.
Is it good enough to match a suspect, because if it is all we need to do is match it up RIGHT??
CASE SOLVED!

Wood, who on Tuesday filed a defamation suit against Fox News, says Griffith's statements are absolutely and unequivocally false. The tape is a genuine representation of Patsy Ramsey's distress and further proves that none of the Ramseys was involved in JonBenet's murder, Wood said. I challenge anyone who says to the contrary to publicly release their recording and the full report of any so-called expert who claims to hear Burke and John on the tape, Wood said. I will be more than happy to take the sworn testimony of any such individual as part of the Ramsey v. Fox News litigation and prove that person upon cross-examination to be a fraud.

What lab would want to get into this after determining that the end of the tape is "mayonnaise". Jameson was the first to say she thought she could hear "something" at the front end of the tape.

Go for it, Tricia! You might as well throw your dollars at another lab, too. You can get ANOTHER version of what is allegedly being said on the tape and "who" is presumably saying it. I anxiously await the deposition of your lab "expert" in the Fox News litigation. Did you tell them that would happen?

The relevance of any findings will be ZERO! Spinning a "hurry up (answer the phone)" or "omygawd" or "help me Jesus" into something incriminating is such a useless waste of time.

There are typing errors all over this forum and others. A sane person would say, "I think those are just typing errors". These idiots would say they were intentional or some subconscious choice and would spin accordingly. The same hold trues for 'slips' of the tongue (from Ramsey statements in interviews and television shows).

Lord, it's tiring. It's depressing too (to see human nature at its worst).

LAST EDITED ON Jan-26-04 AT 03:35 PM (EST)
 
Yes it is Margoo and it looks like it keeps getting worse on alot of cases.

The silence from the BORG conmtinues.

We have all heard the tape - the BORG still lies about what we all can hear.

Jams,

Weren't we supposed to be hearing something dramatic from "the lab" a couple of weeks ago? It's been about seven months since the recordings were made available, if I've got my dates right. Based on my experience in hi-tech, seven months is a LOOOOOONNNNG time. It's actually longer than the time interval between successive product launches in some technical areas. It's 75% of an academic year.

If this so-called "lab" is reputable, they should have already reported their findings, even if those findings are negative --- unless they're doing it "for hire," which seems unlikely. They should say, "Here's what we did; these are the results; this is our interpretation." It seems to me that there is no such report; is that still correct as far as you (or anyone else) know?

Thanks for any information.

I might have made a mistake and posted a response earlier today at the anchored thread on the 911 tape. If so, please feel free to move it here, jameson.

Copyright.

Margoo,

Thanks for your post on the other thread. I was wondering more about the recent claim that they were going to be looking at the recording on a particular weekend, two or more weeks ago. Either they didn't really look at it, or they didn't find anything and nobody wants to admit it, or ??? I was expecting to hear something about this monumental event. Honorable researchers would report, even if the findings were negative.