#0, Prized Possession - The book!
Posted by tipper on Jul-29-02 at 08:41 PM
<a href="http://www.staseywrites.com";>http://www.staseywrites.com<;/a>/<P>You too can download the first four chapters! <P>Get 'em while they're hot!<P>ps You can skip the first 13 or so pages.<P>
#1, I read it
Posted by Myself on Jul-29-02 at 09:31 PM
In response to message #0
and I am wondering what the SBTC would be in her scenario<BR>So Be The ?<P>Obviously she thinks it was John that killed JBR and Patsy who wrote the note. <P>Interesting writing. <BR>I wonder what she would say in terms of motive. <BR>We know that the means and the opportunity could be there but so far we haven't seen any strong motive in this case. People from affluent families don't usually kill their children.
#2, Forget it!
Posted by Lilac on Jul-30-02 at 02:41 AM
In response to message #1
<center><font size="1" color="#ff0000">LAST EDITED ON Jul-31-02 AT 08:53 PM (EST)</font></center><p>I won't read anything written by someone who can't even spell their own name correctly. LOL.<P>She obviously didn't do any real research if she thinks that they killed JBR.<P>We all know that there has never been a child murdered by her parents when there was no history of drug, alcohol, or child abuse in the family.<P>Whatever she has to say, she's just made up. <P>
#4, Yes
Posted by jameson on Jul-30-02 at 08:57 AM
In response to message #2
It is just her theory - - but I am collecting all the books so I will buy it.<P>I suspect eventually the Ramseys will start suing on their own behalf. With the DA saying there wasn't enough evidence to indict - - with no trial or conviction, I think this is pretty risky behavior - - but will let you know after reading the book just what I REALLY think.
#5, Hard to get it
Posted by jameson on Jul-30-02 at 09:05 AM
In response to message #4
First I got nothing but a background - - doesn't work on netscape navigator but could get it on Explorer.<P>Then I clicked and they wanted me to set up Paypal.<P>I wouldn't do that - - I went to Ebay once and they had a warning that Paypal was in litigation somewhere and there was a danger that they could go under - - all monies tied up in that could be frozen.... I don't want to do paypal - - just wanted to read the 4 free chapters. <P>Another click on the print UNDER the book image - - that got me to the free text - - not 4 chapters - - but the introduction and all that and a tiny bit of the book.<P>Obviously she thinks John did something to JBR and Patsy wrote the note and the real clue is SBTC which only she has figured out.<P>I don't think so but will read it.
#6, I didn't have a problem but
Posted by tipper on Jul-30-02 at 09:40 AM
In response to message #5
<center><font size="1" color="#ff0000">LAST EDITED ON Jul-30-02 AT 09:46 AM (EST)</font></center><p><P>you have to scroll about half-way down. The link is on the right side of the page. I'd post it here but she has quite a specific copyright notice. There's nothing new in it. It sounds like she's working up to a bunch of religious clap-trap.<P><BR>Added: You're right! When I tried it just now I get the paypal nonsense too.<BR> <BR>2nd discovery: Click on the words "Download the first four chapters..." and not the picture.<P>
#7, jams
Posted by Myself on Jul-30-02 at 10:35 PM
In response to message #6
I'll email you what I downloaded and we can see if it is the same.<P>M
#8, Goodness!!
Posted by SeaShoreBeauty on Jul-31-02 at 00:55 AM
In response to message #7
IMO this belongs to the trash bin along with the other trash I read about in the Ramsey case. This lady can sure talk! Yes PLEASE skip a few pages...she could discribe a cornflake for pages on if she wanted to. <P>** To some it might be worth reading the full version, but to me, and reading just the sample...it is no different from the rest.
#9, Isn't She
Posted by ziggy on Jul-31-02 at 09:38 AM
In response to message #8
the one who theorizes that SBTC is She Belongs To Christ?<P>Oy.
#10, She may be
Posted by tipper on Jul-31-02 at 02:53 PM
In response to message #9
Her talk about where the letter C leads to would fit. Saved by the Cross is discarded and the whole thing seems to have a religious bent.
#11, Woooo doggies
Posted by LovelyPigeon on Jul-31-02 at 03:19 PM
In response to message #0
as Granny Clampett used to say. That's some fancy schmantzy writing to say nothing.
#12, I actually
Posted by Myself on Jul-31-02 at 05:46 PM
In response to message #11
thought the writing was quite good. If she had been writing about anything else I would have been more positive. I am not a writing critic but she has good style and is eloquent. <P>But writing about a case actually needs technical and forensic knowledge which I can't see in her writing. Maybe she should stick to writing memoirs?
#13, I disagree, Myself
Posted by tipper on Jul-31-02 at 07:20 PM
In response to message #12
<center><font size="1" color="#ff0000">LAST EDITED ON Jul-31-02 AT 07:20 PM (EST)</font></center><p>It's 'way too overwritten for my tastes. <P>Although she might do well in the bodice-ripper genre. :)<P><BR>
#14, maybe because I am Aussie
Posted by Myself on Jul-31-02 at 09:05 PM
In response to message #13
I found the whole anecdotal fashion about the 911 incident enthralling. <P>
|