#4, 5 Cina Wong Deposition
Posted by jameson on Aug-26-02 at 08:09 PM
In response to message #3
10 Q. Did you receive or ever apply for a 11 private investigator license? 12 A. We -- I like to call it 13 certification. I received my certification 14 through the state. And every two years I have 15 to go -- in order to get a renewal, I have to 16 go for a continuing education course. 17 Q. So are you a licensed private 18 investigator? 19 A. In the State of Virginia. It is a 20 licensing course, but what we receive is a 21 registration or a certification. 22 Q. So you have a certification and not 23 a license? 24 A. Right. It is strange. It is a 25 licensing course; but as a private investigator, 0081 1 you receive a certification or a registration. 2 And I am not practicing as a private 3 investigator. 4 Q. And you have no registration as a 5 private investigator? 6 A. Yes, I do. I am registered as a 7 private investigator, but I am not practicing as 8 one. 9 Q. We then move in sequence on your 10 resume to Specialized Course on Document 11 Examination in Bend, Oregon; and you describe a 12 handwriting analysis course instructed by John W. 13 Hargett, the Chief Document Examiner for the 14 U.S. Secret Service, and you go onto describe 15 Mr. Hargett. 16 Would you please tell us when it is 17 that you completed that course? 18 A. Well, I have here that it was in 19 1998. And what -- 20 Q. How many classes did you attend? 21 A. He -- what he was -- the reason why 22 I was interested in taking his course, it was 23 promoted by the Northwest Fraud Investigator's 24 Association out on the West Coast, and this was 25 in the State of Washington. And what he was 0082 1 going to be teaching there, what I was told, 2 was exactly what he was teaching in the Secret 3 Service school that is usually taught over a 4 two-week period. And he was teaching a 5 condensed course for this group in document 6 examination. 7 Mr. Hargett is highly regarded, and 8 I knew that was a course that I definitely 9 would want to take. 10 Q. And I believe I asked you how long 11 you -- 12 A. It was over a three- to four-day 13 period, I believe. 14 Q. A three- to four-day period? 15 A. That is correct. 16 Q. And how many hours per day? 17 A. It was a full day each day. 18 Q. Is there a course syllabus for that 19 condensed course? 20 A. I can't remember. I just know that 21 what he was teaching he said this is what I 22 teach at the Secret Service school. 23 Q. And -- 24 A. And he took us through different 25 exercises, and we worked out certain problems, 0083 1 and he taught us certain basics and some 2 advanced techniques in document examination. 3 Q. You refer to this course as, quote, 4 Specialized, end quote. What was specialized 5 about it? 6 A. Well, that it was not often do you 7 get to take a course by a well respected person 8 like a John Hargett or a Larry Zigler, and I 9 was very fortunate to be able to get this 10 course. And it's specialized because he taught 11 the Secret Service handwriting school, document 12 examination school, and he was also teaching it 13 here. 14 Q. So it was specialized because he was 15 a special individual? 16 A. Well, no. Usually in order to take 17 the Secret Service handwriting course, you have 18 to be a document examiner in the government or 19 someone that is related to the field, and that 20 is when they allow you into that school. 21 Otherwise, you are not able to attend that 22 school. 23 Q. I notice on page 4 of your resume, 24 which is the very next page -- 25 A. Yes. 0084 1 Q. -- that you attended the NWFIA 2 conference in 1998 in Bend, Oregon. Was Mr. 3 Hargett's course in document examination offered 4 as part of that particular NWFIA conference in 5 1998? 6 A. Yes. As I mentioned earlier, NWFIA 7 sponsored that course. 8 Q. What were the requirements to take 9 that course? 10 A. If you had an interest in taking the 11 course, then you could sign up for the 12 conference and attend. 13 Q. Was there a fee? 14 A. Yes, there was. 15 Q. How much was that? 16 A. I can't remember. I am sorry. 17 Q. How many people attended that course? 18 A. Wow. It appeared to be 80 or 100 19 or more people there. 20 Q. Were you graded in that course? 21 A. No, we were not graded. 22 Q. Was it a pass/fail course? 23 A. No, it was not. 24 Q. Did you receive a certificate or a 25 diploma or any indication you had taken that 0085 1 course? 2 A. There may have been a certificate of 3 completion, but I am not sure. 4 Q. Did you submit samples of your work 5 to Mr. Hargett? 6 A. No, I did not. 7 Q. Did you take a test? 8 A. We all were given some work to do, 9 just as in Mr. Zigler's class, to compare 10 handwritings and to see how many writers wrote 11 different signatures and so forth and to match 12 them up. And he also gave us group projects 13 also where a group of us got together, and we 14 decided whether certain documents had one or two 15 writers. 16 Q. Did you receive any individual 17 feedback personally from Mr. Hargett? 18 A. I spoke with him afterwards; that is 19 about it. 20 Q. So he did not comment on your work 21 or your conclusions? 22 A. That is correct. 23 Q. And, Ms. Wong, may I ask you to 24 move backwards and to the top again of page 3 25 of your resume briefly -- 0086 1 A. Sure. 2 Q. -- back to Mr. Andrew Bradley's 3 forensic document examination course. 4 A. Yes. 5 Q. Mr. Bradley is the person you 6 understood to be a former sheriff from 7 somewhere? 8 A. That is correct. 9 Q. When did you take that 20 -- excuse 10 me. I beg your pardon. 11 When did you begin to take Andrew 12 Bradley's course? 13 A. I think I started, I purchased the 14 course in '92 or something, and I was still in 15 California and then moved over here to -- moved 16 over to Norfolk, Virginia. And as I was 17 unpacking, it just kept getting moved around, so 18 I haven't had a chance to finish it. 19 Q. And down to the private investigator 20 licensing course you took in Virginia Beach -- 21 A. Yes. 22 Q. -- when did you take that course? 23 A. Good question. I've had it for a 24 while. I have taken that at least four -- four, 25 five, or six years ago. It has been a while. 0087 1 Q. Was that a correspondence course? 2 A. No, it was not. 3 Q. Did you pay a fee to take that 4 course? 5 A. Yes, that is correct. 6 Q. Was there any degree offered or any 7 grade offered in that course? 8 A. We had to pass a test. And if we 9 didn't pass, we didn't get our registration. 10 Q. Your resume states that the course 11 was an in-depth course. What was in-depth about 12 it? 13 A. He went through all the specifics on 14 investigation, how to handle an investigation and 15 so forth, went into a lot of that. 16 Q. I want to now ask you to tell me 17 some more about the NADE, the National 18 Association of Document Examiners. Earlier you 19 gave us the names of the two founders, Phyllis 20 Cook and Renee Martin. 21 A. That is correct. 22 Q. Does Ms. Cook have an accreditation, 23 please, with the American Board of Forensic 24 Document Examiners? 25 A. I am not familiar with what her 0088 1 background is in that field. 2 Q. Does she have a certification with 3 the American Society of Questioned Document 4 Examiners? 5 A. I don't have any knowledge of her 6 being associated with them or not. 7 Q. And do you know about whether Ms. 8 Renee Martin is certified by the American Board 9 of Forensic Document Examiners? 10 A. I don't have any knowledge on her 11 background with that regard either. 12 Q. Or the American Society of Questioned 13 Document Examiners? 14 A. I don't have any information. 15 Q. The fact is, is it not, that they 16 are graphologists? 17 A. I know that they do have a 18 graphology background, but the National 19 Association of Document Examiners, it is a 20 strict organization of just purely document 21 examination and no graphology. 22 Q. Would I be correct to characterize 23 the National Association of Document Examiners as 24 an organization that is principally comprised of 25 individuals with graphology backgrounds who would 0089 1 like to be document examiners? 2 A. Well, that is not true. We have 3 people there in the police force who are part 4 of our group. We have an ex -- I think he's 5 FBI, an ex-FBI person that is with us. 6 Actually two, or one may be Secret Service. We 7 have some government people, and we have lots of 8 students also. 9 But, no, the large graphology 10 background and then wanting to be is not true. 11 They've -- a lot of the people that attend our 12 conferences are strictly interested in the field 13 of document examination; and we do not teach 14 graphology there. 15 Q. Aren't most members of the NADE 16 individuals who have graphology backgrounds? 17 A. I know there are individuals there 18 with graphology background. To what degree and 19 how many, I am not sure what that number is. 20 Q. And people tend to come to the NADE 21 for accreditation when they cannot get 22 accreditation as a document examiner through some 23 other organization; am I not correct? 24 A. That is not true. There are other 25 organizations that are open to document examiners 0090 1 also. And even Mr. Zigler has a graphology 2 background. Like I said, he taught it to other 3 agents. 4 Q. Who accredits the NADE? 5 A. What do you mean by that? 6 Q. Does it have any accreditation, the 7 organization itself? 8 A. We are an organization. I don't 9 know -- 10 Q. The NADE, that organization -- 11 A. Yes. 12 Q. -- does it have any accreditation 13 from any place at all? 14 A. We are our own group, and we are 15 not a branch from another group where we need 16 to be accredited or separately. We are not 17 with a large group where we have a document 18 examination section and a fingerprint section. 19 No. We are just strictly document examination. 20 MR. RAWLS: Okay. We need a short 21 pause, I am told, for the benefit of changing 22 the videotape, so let's go off the record. 23 THE WITNESS: Sure. 24 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Going off the 25 video record at 11:54. 0091 1 (A recess was taken.) 2 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Back on the video 3 record at 11:57. 4 Q. (By Mr. Rawls) Ms. Wong, is the 5 NADE accredited by any forensic science 6 organization? 7 A. No, not that I am aware of. 8 Q. By any law enforcement group? 9 A. No. I didn't realize law 10 enforcement groups accredited other organizations 11 like document examination. 12 Q. Is there any state or federal 13 government certification or an accreditation of 14 the NADE? 15 A. No, not that I am aware of. 16 Q. There are a -- there are more than 17 just a few organizations that claim to be 18 questioned document examiner organizations; are 19 there not? 20 A. Not claim to be. They say they are 21 document examination organizations. 22 Q. And apart from the NADE, what other 23 ones have you applied to? 24 A. I haven't applied to any other ones. 25 I am happy with the National Association of 0092 1 Document Examiners. But I have heard some good 2 things about AFDE lately, AFDE; and I am 3 interested in finding out more about that group. 4 Q. What is AFDE? 5 A. American Forensic Document Examination 6 group. 7 Q. And, Ms. Wong, with respect to your 8 own board certification you told us about, of 9 the five to seven people in the room when you 10 took the oral portion of the accreditation test, 11 how many of those individuals were, to your 12 knowledge, accredited by some organization other 13 than the NADE? 14 A. I am not aware of what their 15 backgrounds are except for Mr. Liebman. I 16 should say when I mean people in the room, 17 those were the people in the room in charge of 18 making comments and notes with regard to my 19 certification. 20 Q. You joined NADE in 1991, if I am 21 correctly reading your resume; did you not? 22 A. Yes, that is correct. 23 Q. What was required in order for you 24 to be accepted into the NADE as a member? 25 A. As I mentioned, NADE is open to 0093 1 people who are practicing document examiners. 2 They are open to students, and they are open to 3 people who have been interested in the field. 4 So I filled out an application, and I joined 5 NADE. 6 Q. So essentially an application and a 7 fee were all that was required? 8 A. As so it is with most groups. 9 Q. Is the answer yes? 10 A. I am sorry? 11 Q. Is the answer yes to my question? 12 A. Which is, I am sorry? 13 Q. An application and a fee -- 14 A. For NADE, yes. 15 Q. -- were all that NADE required? 16 A. Oh, I am sorry. Application and 17 three letters of reference or recommendation. 18 Q. And who wrote yours? 19 A. One was from Victoria Mertes, who is 20 also past vice president of NADE. And I can't 21 remember who the other two came from. It has 22 been a while. 23 Q. To join NADE, did you have to take 24 any form of test? 25 A. No, I did not. 0094 1 Q. Did you have to get a certain score 2 on anything? 3 A. No, I did not. 4 Q. And what is required for you to 5 continue to be a member of NADE? 6 A. To be a member or a certified 7 member? 8 Q. Well, first a member. 9 A. First a member, you pay your dues. 10 And what the dues include is a newsletter every 11 month, and you receive a professional journal 12 with articles with regard to document examination 13 and notifications of coming conferences, which 14 are reported. 15 Q. And what needs to happen for you to 16 continue to be a certified member of NADE? 17 A. You must attend so many conferences 18 to show that you have continuing education, 19 participate with writing articles for the 20 journal, or a combination of both. 21 Q. Are you a diplomate of the NADE? 22 A. A diplomate, no, I am not. 23 Q. What is a diplomate? 24 A. That -- usually that is held for 25 people who are held in high regard in the 0095 1 association. I haven't applied for it, but 2 there are certain requirements that you have to 3 meet in order to become a diplomate. 4 Q. So you are a past vice president of 5 NADE -- 6 A. That is correct. 7 Q. -- but you have not applied? 8 A. No, I have not. 9 Q. What is required for you to be a 10 diplomate? 11 A. As I mentioned, I am not quite sure 12 what the details are with that. 13 Q. Where is the home office of NADE? 14 A. It is incorporated, I believe, in 15 Delaware or New Jersey, but usually it follows 16 around where the current president is. And the 17 current president at this time is Kathy 18 Koppenhaver, and she is in Maryland. 19 Q. Well, I am sure it has a 20 headquarters office; does it not? 21 A. Oh, I see what you are saying. 22 Usually it is with one of the founders, and I 23 believe it is with Renee Martin. 24 Q. I don't understand your use of the 25 word usually. Is there a headquarters or not? 0096 1 A. I guess I am not sure what you mean 2 by headquarters. But it is with Renee Martin, 3 and I believe she lives in Princeton, New 4 Jersey. Because when you look up the 5 association for NADE, the contact person is 6 Renee Martin, who is past founder. 7 Q. Let me put it this way. Is there a 8 physical office that is the national headquarters 9 of NADE that I could go visit and see people 10 and talk to people and get their brochures, 11 obtain their literature, talk to their 12 receptionist, be escorted to the employees' 13 offices? Is there such a place? 14 A. Oh, we don't have a main office just 15 for that. But Ms. Martin handles all that. 16 Q. Well, do you have any office? 17 A. Yes. Ms. Martin has an office, and 18 also the headquarters of NADE is from that. If 19 anybody needs a brochure on NADE, she would 20 recommend them to contact the membership 21 chairman, or if they would like to speak to the 22 president, then she will direct the call to the 23 president. 24 Q. And is this office in Ms. Martin's 25 professional office? 0097 1 A. Yes, that is correct. 2 Q. And is that in her home? 3 A. I am assuming. I am not sure. 4 Q. You have not visited this office of 5 NADE? 6 A. No, I have not. 7 Q. So are you assuming there is one, 8 but you couldn't tell me for sure? 9 A. I just know from what I am told. 10 Q. Have any of the NADE conferences 11 that you have attended been held in a home 12 office or headquarters office of NADE? 13 A. No, it has not. It is usually held 14 in a location at a hotel with enough conference 15 area to hold all of the members that do attend. 16 Q. How many members does NADE have? 17 A. Last time I checked, which has been 18 a while, it was somewhere between 85 and 89. 19 I believe it is higher now. I believe it is 20 over 100, probably. 21 Q. Once a person is certified by NADE, 22 is there a peer review mechanism within the 23 organization? 24 A. For instance, before the person 25 applies or -- 0098 1 Q. No. After the person is certified. 2 A. Yes. 3 Q. What kind of peer review organization 4 is there or mechanism? 5 A. Well, we have an ethics committee. 6 For instance, if anybody, if it is reported to 7 the ethics committee, they will do an 8 investigation if they find that a member is not 9 behaving within the ethical guidelines. This is 10 for within the organization if we have any 11 complaints. 12 Q. Has anyone ever been expelled from 13 NADE for violating the ethical requirements? 14 A. I believe it was done in a very 15 polite way where the person did not come back. 16 Q. Was the person stripped of his or 17 her board certification? 18 A. This is to the best of my knowledge; 19 I am not sure if these are actual facts of the 20 event. 21 From what I understand, someone 22 claimed to have certification with NADE when, in 23 fact, they did not. So they were not welcome 24 back into the association, and they never had 25 certification to begin with. 0099 1 Q. And that is the only expulsion of a 2 member you are familiar with? 3 A. That I am familiar with. There may 4 be others, but I am not familiar with those. 5 Q. Are there any of the 85 to 89, or 6 possibly more now, members of NADE employed by 7 the FBI? 8 A. Not currently. Some are -- they are 9 retired FBI. We still have some people who 10 work for the state government. 11 Q. Are any of the 85 to 89 or perhaps 12 more members of the NADE employed by the United 13 States Secret Service? 14 A. No, not currently. 15 Q. If I correctly understand your 16 testimony, you yourself have not applied for 17 membership in the American Academy of Forensic 18 service -- excuse me, Forensic Sciences? 19 A. As I mentioned, a lot of those 20 organizations are open to people who work for 21 the government or have come from government 22 jobs. And in that sense, it is a little 23 discriminatory; and I am not able to apply. 24 Q. And have you not applied for the 25 American Board of Forensic Document Examiners? 0100 1 A. I am sorry, which one? 2 Q. The American Board of Forensic 3 Document Examiners. 4 A. That is another group that 5 discriminates against people who are not 6 government employed. 7 Q. Let me ask my question again. 8 A. Sure. 9 Q. It is a yes or no question. 10 A. I am sorry. 11 Q. You have never applied for 12 certification by the American Board of Forensic 13 Document Examiners; have you? 14 A. No. They discriminate. 15 Q. And you also have never applied for 16 certification from the American Society of 17 Questioned Document Examiners; am I correct? 18 A. That is correct. I believe they 19 have the same rules. 20 Q. Have you looked at the requirements 21 for certification by the American Board of 22 Forensic Document Examiners? 23 A. Let's see. I believe so, and I 24 believe it says that is voluntary. A lot of 25 people were grandfathered in early on in the 0101 1 beginning. And I am not sure if it is their 2 group or a different group that their board 3 certification test is sent to them. So it is 4 not taken in a public area where it is 5 proctored. 6 Q. Are you aware that for certification 7 by the American Board of Forensic Document 8 Examiners there are a number of qualifications? 9 Do you know that? 10 A. No. Go ahead.
|