#2, 3 Cina Wong Deposition
Posted by jameson on Aug-26-02 at 08:06 PM
In response to message #1
22 Q. Apart from the one or two cases with 23 the Commonwealth Attorney and the one case with 24 the U.S. Probation Office, have you ever been 25 retained by any government agency at the federal 0037 1 level, at the state level, or the county or 2 city level? 3 A. No. Usually they have their own 4 document examiners. Like I say, it is only 5 when they can't have anybody within their system 6 do it do they go outside. 7 Q. Have you ever been employed as a 8 document examiner by any government agency? 9 A. No, I have not. 10 Q. Ms. Wong, can you give us a 11 definition of graphology, please? 12 A. Yes. Graphology is when -- where 13 people study handwriting specifically for the 14 purpose of learning how to determine someone's 15 personality from their handwriting. 16 Q. And on your resume, if you would 17 turn with me to page 2, under Training, the 18 first thing you list is the, quote, 19 International School of Handwriting Sciences, end 20 quote; is it not? 21 A. Yes, that is correct. There are two 22 portions to that school. There is a portion to 23 the school where Mr. Widmer teaches document 24 examination, and there is a second portion of 25 his school where he does teach graphology. Remove | Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
jameson Member since 5-8-02 08-15-02, 04:19 PM (EST) 2. "3 Cina Wong depo" In response to message #1 0038 1 Q. And Mr. Widmer is a graphologist; is 2 he not? 3 A. He is a document examiner and a 4 graphologist. 5 Q. And by whom is he certified as a 6 document examiner? 7 A. He is not certified. He doesn't 8 belong to any of the document examination 9 groups. He's read all the texts in the field, 10 the leading texts that all document examiners 11 read. 12 Q. And are you a graphologist? 13 A. No. Certainly not. 14 Q. Why do you say certainly not? 15 A. I have looked into it because, as 16 anybody who deals in the field of handwriting 17 sciences, you should look into all aspects of 18 handwriting and study all of it in order to 19 give a comprehensive analysis or speak about it. 20 There are lots of document examiners, I should 21 say, out there who say things about graphology 22 when they don't even know anything about it. 23 How can you speak about something fluently 24 without knowing? So I looked into it. I 25 don't see that there is any validity to it. A 0039 1 lot of people disagree with me. But my area 2 is strictly in document examination. 3 Q. You refer in your CV, this again is 4 Defendant's Exhibit 1 on page 2, and this is 5 immediately under the International School of 6 Handwriting Sciences, you refer to, quote, a 7 six-month program -- 8 A. Yes. 9 Q. -- in Handwriting Sciences, end 10 quote. 11 Did you get a diploma? 12 A. I don't think he issued a diploma, 13 no. 14 Q. Did you get a degree? 15 A. Not a degree, no. 16 Q. Did you get a grade? 17 A. No. Probably I have a certificate 18 of completion, but that would be about what we 19 received. 20 Q. So in those six months, was this a 21 full-time educational curriculum? 22 A. It was once a week. 23 Q. Once a week. Which day of the 24 week? 25 A. You are asking me to think back 12 0040 1 years. I can't remember. I am sorry. I know 2 it was a weekday. 3 Q. And in that once-a-week program, how 4 long were you there the day you were there each 5 week? 6 A. Anywhere from four to five hours. 7 Q. What did you pay for that course? 8 A. I can't remember. It was a while 9 ago. 10 Q. Did you do a term paper in that 11 program? 12 A. No, we did not. 13 Q. Did you submit handwriting analyses 14 for feedback? 15 A. I am sorry. I don't understand your 16 question. 17 Q. Well, in the course of this 18 six-month program, which we've learned was a 19 once-a-week program, four to five hours on that 20 one day a week, were you asked to complete a 21 document analysis and to submit it for review 22 and feedback? 23 A. I am not quite sure what you are 24 saying. But we were asked to bring in 25 handwriting samples; and we would look at them 0041 1 and study them for slant, proportion, placement, 2 letter forms; and that is what we did. 3 Q. Did you demonstrate to Mr. Widmer or 4 anyone else your analysis so that you could 5 obtain feedback and his judgment on whether you 6 were right or wrong? 7 A. Oh, you mean like a personality 8 analysis? I didn't partake in that. I was 9 there for the information with regards to 10 learning the basics, because I was -- there is 11 certain overlap with graphology and document 12 examination strictly with the fact that it has 13 to do with the formations and angles and initial 14 strokes and terminal strokes and letter 15 formations. And otherwise, that is where it 16 stops. 17 Q. Now, the second entry under Training 18 in your resume, and again I am still on page 2 19 of Defendant's Exhibit 1, you list again 20 International School of Handwriting Sciences. 21 And this time your CV tells us of your 22 completion of an advanced course in Questioned 23 Document Examination. 24 A. Uh-huh (affirmative). 25 Q. And according to your resume, this 0042 1 involved forgery detection, case studies, 2 hands-on equipment operation technique, and court 3 qualification procedures. 4 Have I accurately read your CV? 5 A. Yes, that is correct. 6 Q. How long was this advanced course? 7 A. I believe it was over four days, 8 three or four days. It was all day. Or it 9 was eight or ten hours. It was a very intense 10 course. 11 Q. And since Mr. Widmer has no 12 certification as a document examiner, I assume 13 this course was taught by someone else? 14 A. No. There is no standard in this 15 field where you need certification, but Mr. 16 Widmer has studied all the texts in document 17 examination, and he was the one that was 18 teaching the course. 19 Q. So Mr. Widmer taught the six-month 20 program in handwriting sciences as well as the 21 advanced course for three to four days in 22 questioned document examination; am I correct? 23 A. That is correct. 24 Q. Was there anyone that came in to 25 assist Mr. Widmer as a faculty member for those 0043 1 three to four days? 2 A. If my memory serves me right, I 3 think he had assistance from Mr. Marcel Matley. 4 Q. Can you spell that, please? 5 A. Yes, Matley, M-A-T-L-E-Y. 6 Q. Was Mr. Matley a certified document 7 examiner? 8 A. He is certified now through the 9 National Association of Document Examiners. 10 Q. When you say he is certified now, 11 does that mean he was not certified at the time 12 he assisted in teaching this course in 1991? 13 A. That is correct. But he is well 14 read in the field, and he is also well 15 published in the field. 16 Q. What has he published? 17 A. He has published an index that 18 covers all the articles that deal with document 19 examination. He has a book on sequential 20 handwriting. He has a book on forgery 21 detection. Quite a few others that I have in 22 my library that are all document examination 23 related. 24 Q. Now, in 1991, according to the next 25 entry under Training in your CV, you have 0044 1 experience or had a course of study in Signature 2 Identification also in San Francisco; am I 3 correct? 4 A. Yes, that is correct. 5 Q. And according to your resume, this 6 was a study of various techniques used to verify 7 signatures, recognizing different forms of forged 8 signatures, use of equipment to aid in 9 handwriting ID. Am I correct? 10 A. That is correct. 11 Q. How long was this course? 12 A. This course, I believe, it was three 13 days. 14 Q. Who taught that course? 15 A. That was taught by Marcel Matley. 16 Q. Were those full days? 17 A. Yes, definitely. 18 Q. The next course listed is the 19 Effects of Health on Handwriting. This is said 20 to have taken place in Sunnyvale, California. 21 A. That's correct. 22 Q. Is that correct? 23 A. It is near San Jose, Silicon Valley. 24 Q. How long was that course? 25 A. That was a day, full day. 0045 1 Q. And according to your resume, this 2 was taught by Patricia Wellingham-Jones? 3 A. Yes. She is a nurse. 4 Q. And your resume says she is an 5 expert in identifying health related conditions 6 and medications affecting handwriting? 7 A. Yes. She has written a book about 8 that. The course that she taught that day, she 9 had done some research work with regards to how 10 someone with an IV in their arm would affect 11 their signature or not, and different hospital 12 forms when people fill them out where they may 13 look like it is not their signature when, in 14 fact, it is, due to stress conditions or 15 medication. 16 Q. Then, according to your resume, you 17 had advanced training with David Liebman, whose 18 name you have mentioned before as formerly 19 someone with whom you worked? 20 A. That is correct. 21 Q. And according to your resume, this 22 was, this advanced training was in a mentorship 23 program offered by the National Association of 24 Document Examiners. 25 Can you describe, please, how that 0046 1 association offered a mentorship program? 2 A. Yes. There were certain senior 3 members who often -- NADE is an association that 4 is open to all people of all levels of document 5 examination. So whether a person who has been in 6 the field for a long time or if someone is 7 just a student or if someone is just interested 8 in the field of document examination can join 9 NADE. And from there -- there are very few 10 organizations that are open to students where 11 they can receive more information and learn 12 about the field of document examination. And at 13 that time, NADE did offer an advanced mentorship 14 program in document examination where you work 15 hands-on with a document examiner. 16 Q. And how long was this advanced 17 training that you took with Mr. Liebman? 18 A. It was three years, all practically 19 five days a week. 20 Q. Was this more or less on-the-job 21 training? 22 A. Yes, that is correct. 23 Q. Were you paid for that work? 24 A. No, I was not. 25 Q. Did you pay Mr. Liebman for that 0047 1 training? 2 A. No, I did not. 3 Q. Would you receive advanced training 4 by assisting Mr. Liebman in his work as a 5 document examiner? Is that what that program 6 was all about? 7 A. No. I did not assist him with his 8 work. We would -- when cases would come in, I 9 would work on it independently. And then after 10 I finished all my work, I would hand the folder 11 to him with the documents, and he would do his 12 work independently. 13 And then afterwards, he would look 14 at my notes to see how I went through my 15 systematic analysis, and he would critique what 16 I did. 17 And sometimes there were cases that 18 came in that we would need infrared lighting and 19 so forth, and that is something I didn't know 20 at the time, and I learned that through Mr. 21 Liebman. 22 Q. Were you yourself, from 1992 to 1995 23 when you were in this advanced training 24 mentorship, were you taking assignments yourself 25 for a fee from clients? 0048 1 A. I was not working by myself at that 2 time. Towards the end of the program, Mr. 3 Liebman, he was satisfied with my work, and he 4 felt very comfortable with everything that I 5 have learned and how I was proceeding, so I was 6 receiving some money from certain cases. 7 Q. And then you sought and received 8 your board certification from NADE; am I 9 correct? 10 A. That is correct. 11 Q. Is the International School of 12 Handwriting Sciences an accredited university? 13 A. No, it is not. 14 Q. Does it have any accreditation from 15 any organization? 16 A. Not that I am aware of. 17 Q. Is it accredited by the NADE? 18 A. NADE does not accredit any schools 19 or associations, so it wouldn't. 20 Q. What are the entrance requirements 21 for the International School of Handwriting 22 Sciences? 23 A. If you have an inte her -- you know, if someone is interested in 25 the graphology portion, they can pay a fee and 0049 1 learn that portion. And if you are interested 2 in their document examination section, then you 3 take those courses and pay a fee to learn that 4 information. 5 Q. So the entrance requirements are none 6 except payment of a fee? 7 A. I am sorry? 8 Q. The entrance requirements for the 9 international School of Handwriting Sciences -- 10 A. Yes. 11 Q. -- involves simply the payment of a 12 fee? 13 A. If you are interested in it at 14 first, yes. And then you pay a fee to learn; 15 that is correct. 16 Q. No one is going to pay a fee who is 17 not interested? 18 A. I hope not. 19 Q. And there is no application process? 20 A. No, there is not. 21 Q. The payment of a fee is all that is 22 required for entrance into the course? 23 A. That is correct. 24 Q. And to the best of your knowledge, 25 no one is rejected from the course of study who 0050 1 has paid the fee? 2 A. Not that I am aware of. 3 Q. How many people were present with 4 you in this once-a-week program for approximately 5 six months? 6 A. Good question. Probably, I would 7 say, ten to 15. 8 Q. How many of them had a college 9 degree? 10 A. Oh, I am not sure about that. 11 Q. The six-month program which was 12 attended once a week for four to five hours 13 each week, is that the graphology part of your 14 education? 15 A. No. It is part graphology, and it 16 is part that has to do with document 17 examination. 18 Q. Am I correct that the word 19 graphology is not found on your resume? 20 A. That is correct, because I am not a 21 graphologist. I would not be able to tell 22 anyone's personality from their handwriting if my 23 life depended on it, so you would have to just 24 shoot me. 25 Q. Ms. Wong, I am going to try to 0051 1 avoid -- 2 A. Shooting me. 3 Q. -- shooting you, regardless of any 4 reaction we may have to your testimony. 5 A. All right. Thank you. 6 Q. Am I correct that for purposes of 7 your effort to obtain credibility as a document 8 examiner you prefer to disassociate yourself from 9 your graphology studies? 10 A. There are many things -- I am not 11 quite sure how to answer that, what you are 12 asking. But there are many things I have 13 learned in the past. Just because I learned 14 gardening and I don't do it very well or I 15 don't practice it doesn't mean that, oh, well, 16 since I studied it at one time, then I must be 17 a gardener. I don't practice graphology. I 18 don't use it. 19 And I am strictly a document 20 examiner, and I identify and authenticate 21 handwriting. 22 Q. And graphology does not have a lot 23 of credibility among document examiners; does it? 24 A. That is correct. 25 Q. And consequently, to be a or to seek 0052 1 to be a credible document examiner, I am 2 correct, am I not, that you wish to disassociate 3 yourself from your graphology study? 4 A. That is not true. I don't deny it. 5 To be anybody who -- as I mentioned, to be 6 well versed in the field of document 7 examination, you should look at everything that 8 deals with handwriting sciences, because if you 9 don't then you are missing and lacking in a 10 certain area of your studies. 11 In order to be a good scientist, you 12 have to research all areas. And that is what 13 I did in this case. It doesn't mean I believe 14 it, but I researched it. 15 (Defendants' Exhibit-2 was marked for 16 identification.) 17 Q. (By Mr. Rawls) Ms. Wong, Mr. Gallo 18 has just handed you a brochure which has been 19 marked Defendants' Exhibit 2, and I have given 20 Mr. Altman a copy of that and I am looking at 21 a copy. 22 Can you identify that, please, for 23 the record? 24 A. Yes. I haven't seen this before. 25 It is a brochure. I assume it is new. It is 0053 1 titled the International School of Handwriting 2 Sciences. 3 Q. As you look at that, please, would 4 you tell me whether any of these lessons -- and 5 you will see the lessons listed as the ten 6 lessons. 7 A. Okay. 8 Q. Do you see that column? 9 A. Yes. 10 Q. This is essentially, for the record, 11 of course, the video is showing you looking at 12 the brochure. But it is a fold-up paper that 13 contains about eight columns, four on one side 14 and four on the other; am I correct? 15 A. You mean on this side or the back? 16 Q. Four on each side? 17 A. Oh, four on each side. Yes, that 18 is correct. 19 Q. And the ten lessons, do you see that 20 list on the far left side of what I take to be 21 the back page? 22 A. Yes. 23 Q. And tell us if you had any of those 24 ten lessons, please, where you took the courses 25 in 1990 and 1991 out in California. 0054 1 A. Okay. The first one is Use of 2 Space. And that covers how a person uses a 3 piece of paper in regards to margin area, which 4 is something that's used in document examination. 5 How far they start from the top of the paper 6 and how they use this -- how much margin they 7 leave on the side. 8 The Size of the Writing. That is 9 common sense, large and small.
Remove | Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
jameson Member since 5-8-02 08-15-02, 04:19 PM (EST) 3. "4 Cina Wong depo" In response to message #2 10 Q. As you tell us about each of these 11 ten -- 12 A. Yes. 13 Q. -- tell us whether you took that 14 course of study. 15 A. Well, it is interesting, because what 16 he writes underneath is nothing I remember. 17 It says Use of Space, how these 18 principles alone can give you a surprising 19 in-depth analysis. 20 On what I am not sure. 21 The Size of the Writing, how people 22 feel about themselves and others. 23 I don't remember that. I just know 24 size of writing with regards to document 25 examination. 0055 1 The Zonal Principle. How to tell 2 how self actualized someone is. 3 I don't remember that. But I 4 remember zones with regards to upper zones of 5 the handwriting, which would include the upper 6 portions of the lower case H's, top portions of 7 L's and so forth. Lower zones would be the 8 bottom parts of small G's and small Y's. 9 Left and Right Tendencies with Slant. 10 In documentation examination we study different 11 types of slants. His explanation is: Universal 12 concepts that allow you to develop insights in 13 any writing. 14 I don't remember that, and it 15 doesn't make any sense to me. 16 Connective Forms. That is very 17 important in document examination. It shows if 18 something is -- a connection stroke is if it is 19 curved or if it is angular or if it is arcade. 20 Mr. Widmer writes on here: How these show 21 strong indications of personality types and 22 attitudes towards the people and other people. 23 I don't know what to make of that. 24 Pressure. That is something document 25 examiners study. An example is someone who, 0056 1 when they write, when they press very hard into 2 a paper when they write leave deep impressions 3 as opposed to when someone writes with a lighter 4 hand. Mr. Widmer says here: With pressure, a 5 third dimension of handwriting and even what the 6 choice of writing implement can tell about 7 someone. 8 I don't remember covering that, but 9 I remember the heavy and light pressure and 10 medium pressure and varied pressure within 11 writing. 12 Let's see, For Those Who Print, he 13 writes: For those of you that thought you 14 could not analyze printed writing, you better 15 know this because most people today print. 16 All I remember from that course were 17 some unusual printing styles, but I don't 18 remember what the personality aspect that was 19 derived from printing. 20 Specific Letter Formations, he 21 mentions Alphabet from A to I -- A to some -- 22 well, some totally different approach to 23 individual letter formations, the most important 24 letter in the alphabet. 25 I don't know what that is about, but 0057 1 I saw some very unique -- he has an array of 2 samples in his file of interesting letter 3 formations that as a document examiner you need 4 to be exposed to a lot of handwriting in order 5 to figure out what exactly is part of a class 6 characteristic or an individual characteristic of 7 writing. 8 Specific Letter Formations. Doesn't 9 say anything about that. But that also had to 10 do with different letter formations. 11 And Form Level. Form level has to 12 do with the capability in document examination 13 how if they write in the higher form level or 14 a lower, more, I hate to use the word, 15 uneducated form level, someone who is not adept 16 at using the pen or pencil very well. And 17 someone who writes very poorly can't write 18 better than they can write. And not only that 19 was taught in this class, and that is also 20 taught in document examination. 21 And Mr. Widmer has here under Form 22 Level: Taking intuition out of handwriting 23 analysis and putting it all together. 24 So, I don't know. 25 Q. Thank you. We have been going just 0058 1 over an hour. Is this a convenient time for a 2 short recess? 3 A. Yes. I have been trying to hold 4 the best I can. So, yes, this would be great. 5 Q. Good. 6 A. Thank you. 7 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Going off the 8 video record at 10:56. 9 (A recess was taken.) 10 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Back on the video 11 record at 11:11. 12 MR. RAWLS: Evan and Darnay, I had, 13 I believe in an exchange of e-mails, advised you 14 all that at the deposition we would have a 15 check in payment of the expense sum of money 16 which you all had told us about for Ms. Wong's 17 expenses. And, Evan, if I may deliver that 18 check to you now. 19 MR. ALTMAN: Thank you. Sure. 20 MR. RAWLS: I had intended to bring 21 it earlier today. 22 MR. HOFFMAN: Thank you. And just 23 while we're on that subject, I just received 24 your costs on that other case involving Linda 25 Hoffman-Pugh, and that is being sent out to you. 0059 1 And I am assuming that should be sent to your 2 office or to Lin's. 3 MR. RAWLS: My office is fine, 4 Darnay. Thank you.
|