,b>3. before we go off on a wild<BR> goose chase after every single wierdo who ever lived in the vicinity of the state of Colorado, it makes<BR> much more sense to stick with the obvious suspect, one who was in the house at the time, who<BR> strenuously resisted all efforts to have his wife questioned in his absence, who has provided<BR> contradictory accounts of what happened, who refused a lie detector test and then lied about it,<BR> who was so paranoid about the handwriting on the note he hired his own experts to rule him out,<BR> who, if guilty, would have had the perfect motive to write a note like the ransom note as a means of<BR> covering his crime and holding off the police till he could get rid of the body.</b><P>It isn't his handwriting - it isn't his DNA, he had no motive and there is NOTHING in his history that indicates he would do this.<P>I say look at others who were in Boulder that night (had opportunity) who have a history of violent crimes, sexual dysfunction and interest in bondage and true crimes.<P>They focused on the ramseys for 4 1/2 years. Time to focus on the killer.<P>