I'm totally with you as far as Foster and Thomas are concerned.<P>I think you're wrong, though, about the Boulder police doing nothing. That's very unfair. There HAS been a concerted effort to deal with every *viable* suspect. But where can it end? In your mind, everyone with Hi Tec boots, a stun gun, or an attitude problem is a suspect. With such "suspects" coming out of the woodwork, it's impossible for any law enforcement agency to keep up.<P>My own feeling is: 1. yes, there are all sorts of people who might *possibly* have done this crime; 2. but no, it's in fact very un*likely* there was any sort of intruder at all; 3. before we go off on a wild goose chase after every single wierdo who ever lived in the vicinity of the state of Colorado, it makes much more sense to stick with the obvious suspect, one who was in the house at the time, who strenuously resisted all efforts to have his wife questioned in his absence, who has provided contradictory accounts of what happened, who refused a lie detector test and then lied about it, who was so paranoid about the handwriting on the note he hired his own experts to rule him out, who, if guilty, would have had the perfect motive to write a note like the ransom note as a means of covering his crime and holding off the police till he could get rid of the body.