over time then these would be the list of persons to check for the print. If none of them made the print, it would have to come from the intruder. From another thread:<P><BR>10 . "Reply to Annabelle"<BR>Posted by BraveHeart on Jan-09-02 at 02:28 AM (EST)<BR> <BR>Annabelle is correct, in part, as there were more than 4 persons in the room. There were 5 and maybe 8, as follows:<BR>In the windowless room (taken from PMPT):<P>1. John Ramsey 1:04 pm -1:05 pm<BR>2. Fleet White "followed him into the room."<BR>3. FW returned to the room, between 1:06 pm & 1:12 pm (When Arndt made the 911 call)<BR>4. Det. Michael Everett after 1:12 pm & before 1:30 pm <BR>5. Officer Rick French SAW the spot. Did he go in?<BR>6. Det. Larry Mason & Agent Ron Walker arrived at 1:30 pm, then went down to the wine cellar.<BR>Mason cleared the house by 1:50 pm<BR>7. Officers Barry Weiss and Linda Arndt were at the house but it is not publically known whether they were in the wine cellar or not.<P>Summarizing, there were 5 persons minimum and possibly 8 maximum, before the house was secured, that were in the room. To me it doesn't seem that it would be that difficult to determine who, within this small group, was wearing what shoes/boots that day. Counting the Pugh entourage we are dealing with 10-13 total. Is this a big deal? The Hi-Tek boot that made this print was very distinctive, probably not a routine part of the officers and detectives footwear, unless they came in swat uniforms or outdoor/hiking/climbing wear. <BR> <BR>