<a href="http://www.rockymountainnews.com/cr/cda/article_print/1";>http://www.rockymountainnews.com/cr/cda/article_print/1<;/a>,1250,DRMN_15_408302,00.html<P>UNIDENTIFIED FOOTPRINTS<P><BR>Smit's argument: There are unidentified footprints amid the mold on the<BR>wine cellar floor. Experiments conducted by Smit suggest the fast-growing<BR>mold would diffuse footprints quickly, so he believes these were fresh<BR>prints. <P>Unknown shoe tread: One print appears to be a tread from a shoe but<BR>doesn't match shoes owned by John and Patsy Ramsey and doesn't match<BR>any shoes found in the house. The print is in the cellar near where the<BR>body was found. <P>Hi-Tec boot print: Another print belongs to a Hi-Tec boot, which also<BR>does not match any shoes owned by the family. <P>Small footprint: A third mark in the mold could belong to a small<BR>footprint. Smit said it matches the size and width of his own six-year-old<BR>granddaughter's foot. Could it be JonBenet's? If so, it suggests she was<BR>standing in the basement, not knocked out upstairs by a parent in a fit of<BR>rage as one police theory suggests. <P>Response: Police said the Hi-Tec print doesn't match any suspect they<BR>have investigated. <BR>