If the source were unknown, the threads would be on the content of the transcripts and that is, IMO, where the focus should be.

The transcripts prove the Ramseys were cooperative and honest and INNOCENT.

The tabloids got the transcripts - - we all know that. We all know why.

Hate to be rude but it is time to decide if you want to discuss the evidence - - the evidence that shows this forum was right all along - -the Ramseys cooperated, answered every question, did not repeat some memorized statement - and they are frigging INNOCENT!

Stone me all you want. I did what I thought right at the moment. Had I gotten money from Mills and Tracey, or CBS, or Random House for a book, you wouldn't blink an eye.

Instead I sold it to the tabloids believing it would be far better than having the book be the old stories - - a book that will be out there for YEARS.

The book was coming. I made a choice. Hate me for that - criticize me and stone me if you want. I said long ago I am not here to make friends but to do what I can to advance the case and the investigation - - and I have done it to the very best of my ability.

Now - - the important thing isn't if you all like me for what I did. You don't. I understand that.

The important thing is the truth of the transcripts - the Ramseys were cooperative and honest and INNOCENT. There is NOTHING in there that points to Ramsey guilt. They did NOT accuse anyone - - they said they didn't think they knew anyone that evil. But they answered all questions and yeah, some answers prove they are human. Big damn deal.