Catherine Crier and John Walsh and others don't do the research - - they trust others to do it for them. I think they need to demand a bit more honesty in detail.

We have Crier talking to Darnay Hoffman who is suing the Ramseys for accusing 2 people in their book of killing JonBenét - - like they couldn't make up their mind? Actually, they don't accuse either one - - they correctly said they were looked at as possible suspects. We have her saying that some unnamed source says some cops believe the bootprint is Burke's - - and suddenly is seems more like a fact that it WAS Burke's print - - and the <b>FACT</b> is that some cops have decided that could be an explanation that would fit their BORG theory. They can't prove it is Burke's - - it is a theory that is NOT supported by the evidence. (You can see why Beckner backed off it - - he knows better. The print is a mystery. Period. Much more likely it was a COPS' print than Burke's.)

John Walsh had JonBenét being put to bed in a red shirt then changed, and he had JonBenét hanging inthe basement, cut down by her father.

Realize, they are not well-informed on case - - this case isn't THEIR addiction. They have dozens of cases and they are just telling a story as they heard it from someone else.