> By whom, prey tell. <BR>By someone who thought that it was the right and proper thing to do; that it was not in any way an evil act, although it was obviously considered by society to be an unlawful act. By someone who was coincidentally nearby and felt it would be well worth his efforts to "do the right thing".<BR>>Motive? <BR>Mission Kill.<BR>Recall perhaps my analogy to a sniper who puts a bullet through the picture window of an abortionist's home. Now keeping that analogy in mind, think of a sniper who instead of shooting the abortionist, shoots a six year old daughter instead. <BR>Its simply a mission-kill, not a kidnapping, not a sexual molestation; simply a just and proper revenge exacted by someone who felt then and to this day feels that he 'did the right thing'. Someone who is not at all troubled by the deed and not at all concerned with it. Its a bit like that hypothetical nutcase that I proposed a while ago: the guy who observed JonBenet being allowed to step on a sidewalk crack. Well, that nutcase is still a nutcase, but he is no longer necessarily concerned with sidewalk cracks. However, he doesn't think he did anything wrong. Just illegal.<BR>-------------------------------------<BR>I think I'd like to add to the above 'not wrong, just illegal' theme that I would imagine the perpetrator would have some very interesting views on morality and on justness of laws and law enforcement. I also would think he would be rather more than 'intellectually concerned' with such issues, I would think he actually in involved with such issues in his daily life.<P><BR>