I thought I'd bring this over here too, even though most of you know my theories already.<P>"Requesting Toth's Theory & Views" <BR>Brief synopsis:<BR>Not an inside job.<BR>Not a kidnapping gone wrong.<BR>Murder right from the start.<P>Despite the minimal trappings of perversion, the intruder is probably not a pedophile at all but instead prefers the use of adult females, though probably not their company or companionship.<P>The crime is a brutal and protracted killing. It is not a sex crime. The sexual activity appears "minimal" in comparison to the time and efforts devoted to other aspects and activities of the crime that night.<P>A pervert would have wanted to do perverse acts on JonBenet, not write even a short note about it. A pervert would have wanted to take her somewhere else for extended activities.<P>I view this crime as similar in concept to a sniper shooting an abortionist: it is a "mission kill", not a crime of passion or perversion. Just as the sniper probably never met the abortionist, I think the intruder never met JonBenet or ANY of the Ramseys. It is likely he viewed them as he "cased the joint" and may have seen what was clearly a family departing on some excursion in the afternoon, but he never met or interacted with them directly.<P>I think the intruder had an abiding hatred and an all-consuming intense rage related to certain thematic aspects that I have previously commented on but can not elaborate on in any fashion whatsoever without jeopardizing certain personnel involved in the investigation.<P>I've never viewed this as some sort of 'inside job' or 'cover-up' in any way. The media campaign and police obsession is revolting. Why would anyone suddenly decide to kill one of their children: such acts would require a long history of a troubled life beset by severe poverty and drug abuse as well as protracted psychiatric problems.<P>I've been wary of McSanta because he liked being around kids and my suspicions were heightened by the discovery of his pornography habits, but I do not think he was involved in the crime despite his strange fascination with JonBenet.<P>I've been concerned about Fleet White, but have concluded that he is simply a very strange character who got caught up in this mess. I think that any 'backbone' he might have would be found on the skeletons in his closet. He may be a bit creepy, but that does not make him a murderer.<BR>