Go back to previous page
Forum URL: http://www.webbsleuths.com/cgi-bin/dcf/dcboard.cgi
Forum Name: old depo and interview threads
Topic ID: 76
Message ID: 0
#0, John in Atlanta 6
Posted by jameson on Nov-03-03 at 09:53 AM
68
15 Q. (By Mr. Kane) Mr. Ramsey, after
16 December 26, 1996, did you ever go back in
17 the house?
18 A. No.
19 Q. You never were in it after that?
20 A. No.
21 Q. Did you ever go back to the
22 house?
23 A. I think I drove by it, but I
24 never went back to the house.
25 Q. You mentioned Dorothy Allison

69
1 earlier. Is this Dorothy Allison the
2 psychic, she is now dead?
3 A. As far as I know. I heard she
4 is dead.
5 Q. Well, I said that. That wasn't a
6 question. Dorothy Allison is the Dorothy
7 Allison who was a psychic that's made
8 comments about this?
9 A. As far as I know. I never laid
10 eyes on Dorothy Allison, nor heard her. She
11 was on a television program about this case,
12 and we received information as a result of
13 some things she said in terms of leads.
14 Q. Okay. And that was part of that
15 packet you handed in there?
16 A. Uh-huh (affirmative).
17 Q. There was a sketch that was made
18 based on a description that she --
19 A. Right.
20 Q. -- created. Are you aware of
21 that, that sketch?
22 A. Yes.
23 Q. Have you gotten any leads as a
24 result of that sketch?
25 A. We have gotten -- I know the lead

70
1 level went up dramatically when we put that
2 out there, and I think the reason for
3 putting it out there was to keep things
4 stirred up. One of our objectives certainly
5 has been to keep this active in the public's
6 mind.
7 Q. So after that --
8 A. Yeah, we got a lot of leads after
9 that.
10 Q. When you say you put it out
11 there, what do you mean?
12 A. It was put on our website by the
13 investigators.
14 Q. Okay. And you say after that, it
15 got put on your website, you got a lot
16 of --
17 A. Yeah.
18 Q. And is that still on your
19 website?
20 A. I haven't looked, but I don't
21 believe so.
22 Q. Why is that?
23 A. We are trying to keep the website
24 active so people come back. The whole
25 objective here is to keep it stirred up,

71
1 keep it active.
2 Q. Is the ransom note on the
3 website?
4 A. It was -- well, the ransom note?
5 No, I don't think so. No, not that I know
6 of. I mean, I haven't seen it there.
7 Q. Was that a conscious decision not
8 to put it on?
9 A. I wasn't directly involved with
10 what went on that website from the beginning.
11 I don't know if it was a conscious decision
12 or not.
13 MR. WOOD: I think Ollie would
14 probably know.
15 THE WITNESS: I think it's on the
16 web in other places, I've been told.

Now I have not been one to publicly criticize the Ramseys and their friends in the past but I will here and now. I personally continue to think it is important to keep the discussion going - to keep people talking about this unsolved case. I think the Internet is a great tool to use - and the Ramseys, their family and friends have not continued to do that - and I think that is a shame. Several URLs are no longer active and I wish they were.

I don't work for the Ramseys, never did, and never took direction from them. I have done what I have done because of my own drive and I think it is right to keep this going as long as the posters are willing to keep it alive. So we are here. I will share what I can and will do it in the way I think best.

Yes, the BORG is welcometo take the transcripts to their forums for discussion - I have no problem with that - - just want the truth out - let the chips fall where they may.