I still don't know what this is about - - were they trying to make John think fibers from his shirt were on the body and he needed to explain how an intruder could have gotten the fibers...??? if so,they didn't get anywhere as John just answered honestly - didn't jump for the opportunity to explain the theory the cops seemed to hold dear.

I think they were trying to see if John would try to "explain" the fibers as some sort of transfer from his shirt to JonBenét's underwear via mingling in the common laundry (via the chute).

I think it is pretty obvious that there were dark fibers in JonBenét's genital area (in her underpants), but I believe they tried to pin them on Patsy's housecoat (dark blue) - as per, I believe, the NE questioning of '97 or '98 - and now on John's black shirt. I don't believe they have a report bearing out a CONSISTENT WITH (and it goes without saying they do not have a match, because there would be no such thing as a fiber match).

It does not make ANY SENSE AT ALL to assume Levin was trying to PROTECT investigation information on this issue (keep it from the Ramseys and their attorneys). After all, the insinuations from the line of questioning were a big enough TIP OFF to what they were saying (pretending) they had.

What is most significant is that - NEVER - has John even tried to imply any innocent explanation of fiber transfer. These guys are barking up the wrong tree. John's reaction is an honest one ... pure OUTRAGE at the suggestion that he had a sordid relationship with JonBenét. These guys make me sick!