21 Q. (By Mr. Levin) Mr. Ramsey, it is
22 our belief based on forensic evidence that
23 there are hairs that are associated, that the
24 source is the collared black shirt that you
25 sent us that are found in your daughter's

58
1 underpants, and I wondered if you --

Well, Mr. Levin isn't exactly the most articulate investigator of all time. He mentions "hairs" when clearly he means "fibers," and his sentence isn't particularly grammatical . . . But the meaning seems clear enough. Fibers were found in the area in and around JonBenet's genitals that have been sourced to John Ramsey's "collared black shirt."

This is BLOCKBUSTER news, folks. You won't see it in the Tabs, because they've learned their lesson by now and are wisely steering clear of this case. But IMO this is could well be the most telling revelation we've had in all the years we've been puzzling over this case on the forums.

Team Ramsey can dismiss this as a bluff till the cows come home. But you should all be prepared to deal with the very real possibility that it is NOT a bluff. I for one see no reason for Levin to have bluffed on this or any other point at that late date. The investigation of the fiber evidence might have been flawed, the "match" they found could certainly be contested. But the fact that the police believe they've found such a match is VERY big news and potentially VERY damaging to John Ramsey. No wonder even the new DA has never agreed to let the Ramseys out from under that umbrella of suspicion.

Jameson et al.: I urge you to develop some sort of fallback position regarding these fibers in the very VERY likely event Levin was NOT bluffing. You may not be happy with MY take on this (which gives John the benefit of the doubt) but consider the alternative.