DocG - I am glad to see you here trying to sort this out with us.

If the fibers were on anything the killer wore - - no matter who the killer was - that would explain matching fibers on her bedding, on her clothes... after all, he carried her to the basement, touched her and her clothes. But if they were on a shirt and he had a jacket over it, that might explain an absence of fibers there...

I think he did not pull down her longjohns, that he slipped his hand down them and the wrist band of the dark article of clothing came in contact with the wet genitals and so the fibers were left there and no where else.

Now I do know that the Ramseys belongings were searched looking for something that might leave those fibers - - the floors of the closets were gone over with tape to pick up fibers, for example - - and no match was found.

I don't believe the shirt fibers match - - and I think the questions about dry-cleaning were put in there to suggest that might have altered the fibers enough...

See - I think they did not have a match and this was a bluff. I think they lost.