I disagree Maikai. It was obvious that this "interview" was nothing more than an extension of their previous interrogations. The Ramseys were sick to death of answering the same questions over and over again that were obviously meant to back them into a corner or to trip them up or force some kind of confession.

They finally agreed to an interview thinking the BPD would play fair only to find out they once again had an agenda. They lured them into the interview under false pretenses. They had no intention ever of playing by the rules they agreed to.

The bath issue was merely meant to create a legitimate source for the DNA evidence and to discredit the intruder theory. Even if it had jogged Patsy's memory, what possible importance to the murder would it be?

The panty issue was also a means of discrediting the DNA evidence. What other possible relevance could there be to the panty issue? Even if they thought the killer put the panties on her, what does that tell them? They are looking for a killer that knows the days of the week?

The questions about Burkes shoes was meant to discredit the Hi-Tec footprint. All of the questions they asked her were designed to discredit intruder information. To find out how much she knew, to find out how much information Lou Smit had shared with them and to attempt to trip her. There was NOTHING new in any of these questions. Just the same old tired CRAP.

If I'd been Patsy I would not have sat quietly. I would have told him to ask me new questions or I was leaving because I had better things to do that sit around in a room full of morons. While they are obsessed with panties and pineapple, a vicious, violent predator is walking the streets.