about releasing the tapes/transcripts of the meeting to the public? Obviously, since excerpts are being posted, there must not have been any kind of confidentiality agreement signed, right? Kane even accused LW of posturing.
It appears to me, the whole line of questioning by Kane and company was geared to information they didn't mind being released. How could they discuss any new information if it was possible it could be released to the public? If it was suppose to be a give and take type session, then why was it so one-sided?