>If the Ramseys truly have nothing to hide, then why do they
>need a Lin Wood to stand between them and the truth? Why
>can't Wood let them simply answer the questions as honestly
>as they can? With a lawyer like that, who needs the BORG?

It isn't a matter of what they had to hide. It is a matter of what they had to protect. Your assumption is that Lin Wood is standing between the Ramseys and truth. It appears to me that Lin Wood is standing between the Ramseys and the very real possibility of a wrongful prosecution.