LAST EDITED ON May-17-03 AT 09:00 PM (EST)
 
Q. Page 35, Linda Hoffmann-Pugh, do you know who -- did you ever interview Linda
Hoffmann-Pugh?

A. No, sir.

Q. You never had the opportunity to judge her credibility yourself to see whether she might, in your
opinion, like Jackie Dilson might be somewhat unstable or not credible?

A. I don't know that I've ever met Linda Hoffmann-Pugh, no.

Q. Do you know how many days a week Linda Hoffmann-Pugh worked for the Ramsey family?

A. Without reviewing reports, no, I don't.

Q. Do you know what time of the morning she would get there and how long she would stay?

A. Again, without reviewing reports concerning Ms. Hoffmann-Pugh, I do not.

Q. Do you think you had some of those reports about Ms. Hoffmann-Pugh in your materials that you
copied and after you left the department or received from the Boulder Police Department after you left
the department?

A. I don't know.

Q. We can only tell when we find them, right, that would tell us more information about what you
know about Linda Hoffmann-Pugh, true?

A. Or again if we can work our way into the police department.

This man was one of the biggie investigators and he didn't know how often LHP was at the house? He never met her? Coffman, Schiller, Shapiro and many others were more involved than the "detective" - - this deposition exposes the BPD big time. They need some schooling in police work, IMO.

Detectives may not have to do ALL the work, but when a team is working on a case they should share information - - and the man who puts in the most hours and is considered by the media to be not only the "lead detective" but "main leak" should at least know the basics of the case before writing a book.

The man was shameless - - but the book (as he states years later) was just his POV.... shame he didn't work as hard as we do to try to get it right.