Jayelles asked the posters yonder if they would list the evidence - FACTS - that pointed to an intruder exclusively. I opened the thread with interest because I can think of several things - - the cord, tape, stun gun, pubic hair, DNA, Hi-Tec boots, handwriting.... but I didn't expect to see that list there - - and I was not disappointed.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Jayelles said the DNAX may point to an intruder but she doubts they can link it to the crime.

Imon offered a suggestion that one of the Ramsey kids may have been fathered by someone other than John.

-------------------------

Tipper nicely brought up the handwriting and said, "John was eliminated and Patsy was all but eliminated."

Tipper also said that she has to consider something written by Ann Rule...(paraphrased) “One of the things that must be weighed is: ‘Is this person capable of this crime?’” She said she didn't see that in Ramsey.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Jayelles said Ann Rule couldn't believe that Bundy was capable of his crimes. And family members often say they just can't believe their loved ones are evil.

Jayelles also said the handwriting can't be taken as intruder evidence "because the experts disagree." (I don't count Darnay's "experts". They didn't have the right samples and the federal judge basically discredited them.)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I don't understand howanyone can think Jayelles is really on the fence - - her bias is strikingly obvious to me.