I would consider the forensic tape analysts at Aerospace to be experts. They had the state-of-the-art equipment and they conducted a perfectly clinical process. If the result of this is an enhanced version of the tape which has a voice on it -- which sounds like a young child -- in a house where there IS a young child (who has admitted that he was awake and heard his parents shouting), then I will remain open minded about whether Burke's voice was on that tape. Nowhere have I stated that Burke's voice is on that tape. The possibility remains however that it may be.

Two labs were unable to enhance the tape and two labs enhanced it to hear the voices - but interpreted the actual words in different ways. Sounds like it's 50:50 in favour of the voice being there. "What" he allegedly said is inconsequential. If he was up and curious, why did his parents say that he was not?

In the meantime, I will place more value upon the word of someone who has heard the enhanced tape over that of someone who hasn't.