Go back to previous page
Forum URL: http://www.webbsleuths.com/cgi-bin/dcf/dcboard.cgi
Forum Name: old depo and interview threads
Topic ID: 25
Message ID: 4
#4, AARGHHHH!!!!
Posted by jameson on May-18-03 at 02:10 PM
In response to message #3

Q. Page 286, you make reference to a red turtleneck being stripped off of JonBenet when it got wet
from I guess her bed wetting.

MR. DIAMOND: Where are you?

Q. (BY MR. WOOD) Third paragraph down "I concluded the little girl had worn the red turtleneck
to bed, as her mother originally said, and that it was stripped off when it got wet." Are you talking
about wet from urine?

A. In this hypothesis we're talking about, yes.

Q. Did you ever have or the Boulder Police Department to your knowledge ever have the red
turtleneck found in the bathroom tested forensically to determine if it had any type of trace evidence or
other evidence on it?

A. Again, it sounds like you know otherwise but I was under the impression from Trujillo that there
wasn't a presumptive test for urine.

Q. Did anybody tell you that they found the red turtleneck and that it was wet?

A. No, this is what I am surmising in the hypothesis.

Q. Was the red turtleneck taken into evidence?

A. I certainly believe it was.

Q. Did it have any type of urine stain on it?

A. Not that I'm aware of. I never have looked at it personally.

Q. Where did you get the statement that it got wet; did you just manufacture that out of whole cloth?

A. No, I'm suggesting that that was a reasonable explanation for the final resting place of this red
turtleneck of which she may have indeed worn home.

Q. But you had no evidence to support that statement about the turtleneck being wet, true?

A. No, I don't know that it was urine stained.

Q. Or wet?

A. Or wet.