>There is nothing at all out there that I know of that makes
>Steve Thomas a suspect. Not a thing.

Well I can still speculate can't I? He's probably never been investigated has he? I mean why would he? So, absent any investigation why would you have seen any evidence against him?

It's a possibility that this crime was committed by someone who wanted to create a crime in order to solve it and get attention from it. There are many cases of arsonists who turn out to be fire fighters, and nurses or doctors that induce a "trauma" so they can rescue the patient and be a hero.

You have to admit that there are a lot of things that point to someone in law enforcement.

1. MagLight
2. Hi-tech boot print
3. Interest in crime movies.
4. Reference to authories in RN
5. Apparent knowledge of forensics and staging.

Still I don't think Steve was the killer. Like I said, he's too stupid.