Yeah, TGRB, I too respect and even admire Jameson. She is a very interesting, smart, diligent and probably honest and sincere person. Also very devoted. Possibly to the wrong cause. She's stood by her guns and over the years taken a lot of crap from people who were often misinformed or simply wrongheaded.

Her problem is that she is every bit as stubborn and unyielding as the BORGest of the BORG. Neither camp is even close to understanding this case, IM (humble) O.

MY memory of the magic moment when I got interested in this case (i.e. HOOKED) is the moment I'm watching the news on TV and one more time am hearing about how the police have not yet interviewed the parents of JonBenet Ramsey. And I'm saying to myself, WHY are the police bending over backwards to placate these people? And WHY are the parents NOT eager to work with the police to solve the crime and catch not only the murderer of their child, BUT an extremely dangerous person who could threaten OTHER children, including their own surviving child.

As far as the reports regarding absence of footprints are concerned, you are misinformed. This was NOT false reporting. The relevant observations are recorded in one of the early warrants. Your comments regarding snow have nothing to do with the actual police report, which focused on frost, NOT snow. There was a coating of frost. No prints were found on either the older patches of snow OR the fresh coating of frost. Lou Smit's release of photos showing only patches of snow in full sunlight, hours after the original observations were made, has convinced me that he is NOT an impartial investigator of this case BUT a Ramsey advocate. Whether he's been paid or not I have no idea. Neither does anyone else except he and the Ramseys.