Problems with JMK's "confession" and other problems:

1. First, it is reported that he said he DRUGGED and had sex with her. There were no drugs found during autopsy. Also, no semenal fluid found within- no evidence of penetration, although some slight vaginal injury from what I recall...

HOWEVER, HE DID NOT SAY THIS DIRECTLY TO REPORTERS- A THAI OFFICIAL PROVIDED THAT "STATEMENT"....POSSIBLY A MIS=TRANSLATION PROBLEM OR THE THAI OFFICIAL JUST WANTING TO GET ON CAMERA. AS FOR SEMEN...THIS NUT-JOB'S IDEA OF "SEX" COULD BE PRACTICALLY ANYTHING.

2. Another problem...his ex says he was with her during that Christmas...in Alabama.

HOWEVER, I READ ON FOXNEWS THIS MORNING THAT SHE DOES NOT SPECIFICALLY REMEMBER XMAS OF 1996....SHE JUST SIMPLY SAID SHE CANNOT RECALL A XMAS WHEN HE WAS NOT WITH THEM OR LEFT SHORTLY AFTER. THAT IS DIFFERENT THAN A SPECIFIC MEMORY, AS IN SOMETHING LIKE "I SPECIFICALLY REMEMBER WATCHING CNN WITH HIM ABOUT THE JONBENET MURDER WHEN THE NEWS FIRST BROKE". THAT WOULD BE A REAL PROBLEM.

SHE ALSO SAID SHE CANNOT DEFEND HIM...SO WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?

3. Probably the biggest obstacle is the fact that this guy is seriously mentally ill...or seriously crafty...who knows what kind of "straight" answer they'll ever get from him?

THE DNA WILL EITHER PROVE IT OR DISPROVE IT. WE JUST HAVE TO WAIT.
WE'VE WAITED THIS LONG....WE CAN WAIT A LITTLE LONGER, RIGHT?