I have posted before (long ago) on the similarity of the autopsies of Jessica Butts and JonBenet. They both had been strangled (Jessica with a phone cord wrapped multiple times around the neck, JonBenet with the garrot). They both had been hit on the head, (Jessica with a phone, and JonBenet with something like a police knightstick). They both had been assaulted sexually with an object, (knife?, paintbrush?). The similarities suggested to me that the killer might have been involved in both murders.

It dawned on me this morning (at dawn) that the pubic hair was intentionally left on Jessica's toe, while a pubic hair was similarly left at the scene of JonBenet's crime.

You might say pubic hairs are very common at sex-motivated murder scenes. But why is that? The killer is sexually active, you might think. But the sexual activity in these cases is with some inanimate object. So what does that mean? I suppose you could say that when someone kills someone a pubic hair always falls. Well, in my opinion, it could be a "signature".