Lou's truibute page and guestbook is sponsored by WebbSleuths. It is found at
http://books.dreambook.com/jameson245/guest.html

There are a couple of recent messages I respondedto in email and I want to share that here.

ROBERT wrote:
I AGREE THAT PATSY RAMSEY DIDNT NOT DIRECTLY KILL THE CHILD.BUT SOMEONE IN THE HOUSE WAS INVOLVED. PATSY PROBLY DID NOT WANT TO SHARE THE WEALTH WITH THE OTHER FAMILY.AFTER LOOKING AT ALL THE EVIDENCE IT SEEMS THAT SOME ONE WANTS HER OUT OF THE WAY BY FRAMING HER.WHY WASNT JOHN ANDREWS GIVEN A POLYGRAPH TEST AND LUCINDA RAMSEY JOHNSON THEY TEND TO BE THE ONES THAT HAVE THE MOST TO GAIN FROM THE MURDER IF PATSEY WAS OUT OF THE WAY. MY EXPERIANCE WITH PHONY STEPMOTHERS,WELL WE DON'T NEED TO BE TO HONEST. I BELIEVE THAT THE AUTHORITIES NEED TO TAKE A CLOSER LOOK TA THE OTHER FAMILY. THEY HAVE A GO ALIBI BUT IT DOESNT MEAN THE WHERE NOT INVOLVED.
Monday, January 26th 2004 - 01:50:35 PM

I responded to him:

I read your letterin the Lou Smit guest book and decided to respond.

You think Lucinda and her children might have killed JonBenét because they didn't want to share John's fortune with her?

Huh?

Lucinda and both of her children were in Georgia at the time of the murder - physically impossible for them to be the killers.

Both John Andrew and Melinda wwere publicly cleared in this investigation.

And both John Andrew and Melinda have publicly supported Patsy - said she was a very loving step-parent - they considered her their second mother - not the evil step-mother.

All of that is public information - I think you should do a bit more research before you accuse innocent people - - in doing the wrong thing you are giving the guilty party a pass.