Left unchecked, the BORG forums would rewrite history in order to convict the Ramseys of murdering their daughter.

This is just a bit of today's BORG discussion:

Twitch asked if the red jumpsuit was "... the same garment that is referred to as the turtleneck? That was soaking in the sink?"

Turtleneck soaking in the sink? WHAT turtleneck soaking in the sink? Nothing like that in the Ramsey case.

Watching You, who claims to be a "Superior Bee Admin", is either confused or playing games with BORG heads to keep them in the fold. She posted, "That's what I can't figure out, Twitch. They called it a turtleneck, Patsy called it a red jumpsuit. Either way, what reason would there be for Patsy to wash it out at that particular time and then leave it there balled up - still wet?"

Ah, the BORG - they are totally lost when it comes to discussing case facts but would convict and execute the parents based on what they don't know because it would feel good to be able to say "I told you so."

FACT - there was a red turtleneck in JonBenét's bathroom. It was clean and dry when found - - tossed to the side when JonBenét preferred to wear the white shirt.

FACT - there was a red jumpsuit found in the laundry area. Patsy had looked at it and spread it out in the open because she had seen a spot on it and wanted to remember to take it to the cleaners at a later date.

Two articles.

Neither wet or soaking in any sink.

QUESTION - What BORG theory is at work here? Is this a new one? Are we to think someone changed JBR into the red shirt or turtleneck and then killed her and gotten stains on the red material and then changed the child back into the top she wore to the Whites and possibly the wet long johns and then put the body in the windowless room and then soaked the stain out of the red material and then....

Good grief - - how tortured is THAT theory?