Cewofty wrote, Lou "... didn't remain unbiased! He jumped to the conclusion the Ramseys were innocent because he didn't think the Boulder police were doing a good enough job and because he considered the Ramsey's loving parents incapable of "doing this"...that's an actual statement of his. He went into this case biased and he remains that way!"

jameson response - Bull - - where is that quote?

Cewofty wrote, "I don't even follow this case closely and even I know that the DA said some of the evidence that pointed to an intruder had already been identified by the police as coming from family members."

jameson - No... I don't think so. Again - share the quote, please. If you are talking about the BORG lie that the boot belonged to Burke, I suggest you make a few calls - - the boot print remains unsourced.

Evidence of the family being in their own home is plentiful. Evidence of involvement in the murder is .... how to say this.... Zero, Zilch, Nada, NONE!

I wrote that Michael Kane tried to railroad the parents and failed.

Cewofty wrote, "Does that matter? If you truly want to know the murderer of that poor little girl, let the evidence lead the case."

jameson comment - Does it matter that Kane ignored some evidence and fought to supress other evidence because it was not pointing to the Ramseys? You bet it does. What he did was shameful. And anyone who supports what he did is not interested in justice, just vengence, right or wrongly directed.