Jayelles posted: "jameson has said that she "didn't defend Westerfield" and that she "never said he was innocent" - both of which are true of you take them literally."

She is right so far...

Then she went on and wrote, "... she said she thought they had the wrong man and that Damon was a better suspect for Danielle's death."

The prosecution didn't prove that Westerfield was ever in the Van Dam house, they didn't prove he was with a child that weekend or that he was ever at the Dehesa site where Danielle's body was found. There was no evidence of his DNA on Danielle's body... and I see a lot of reasonable doubt there.

I don't know who killed Danielle - I couldn't have convicted Westerfield on the evidence presented in court.

And I will still say that the father's story of dogs and doors makes no sense to me.

I don't know who killed Danielle. I do know that I would never defend anyone who would hurt a child.