Thousands of posts later ...

I find it an interesting phenomenon that the Ramseys are accused of not cooperating, not providing a 'transcriptable' series of statements in their earliest days of shock, but when they did come in for a video-taped interview/interrogation, the results were a continuum of disbelief regarding their statements.

Following the April '97 and June '98 taped interviews (and statements), their book full of statements, their appearances and statements on talk shows or in print, the Atlanta 2000 taped interview, depositions in the Miller and Wolf cases, etc. etc. - the consensus is ----->>>>>>>>> DISREGARD WHATEVER THEY SAID (unless, of course, it bolsters an argument supporting "hinky" or "guilty-sounding" statements) for, of course, they are LYING.

The Ramseys don't make video-taped statements in January '97 and they are damn well damned. They DO make video-taped statements before LE and on TV, and written in their book, etc. and they are damn well damned.

So, what do they want? Do they want the statements just so they can call them MURDERERS AND LIARS or would they have preferred they were silent so that they can call them MURDERERS and uncooperative?

As the years pass, and the Ramseys have exhausted their personal funds on a private investigation, and are still out there demanding attention to this case and demanding a determined effort to find their daughter's killer, they are sill being touted as the only ones who could be responsible (and, of course, liars)!! Does that make SENSE to anybody?

Tricia offers a $5,000 reward for information leading to ... She admits that the $5,000 is really not going to do much to entice anyone to come forward and probably won't have to be paid out ... Its purpose then is ... ???? After all, no one notable came forward when there was a $million reward and no one notable came forward when there was a substantial reward offered by the Ramseys ... so, Tricia's $5,000 reward will serve what purpose?? Sounds "hinky" to me - LOL!