Go back to previous page
Forum URL: http://www.webbsleuths.com/cgi-bin/dcf/dcboard.cgi
Forum Name: more and more JBR
Topic ID: 2122
Message ID: 38
#38, RE: Vague note
Posted by Saluda on Feb-15-04 at 09:44 PM
In response to message #37
>It could be that John offended someone who was very
>unimportant in his life and mind. It could be as simple as
>cutting someone off in a conversation or not saying thank
>you when someone made a delivery to his office.

Is there any record of a murder of anyone, or a member of anyone's family, such as a child, by a creep, based only on an overly sensitive reaction to a small slight? Pardon my ignorance if there is. I know that there are instances where a perp who already sort of had a plan to kill got set off by something in passing the victim said, such as may have happened in the Dartmouth faculty killings (or just the visual stimulus of money in the man's wallet in that case). But to put a plan into action to kill a person, or to kill a man's child, to put a plan into action only because of a small slight?.... where has this happened before?

I am more inclined to think JonBenet's murder was in the broad class of the L&L variety, or by a sick-O teenager experimenting with his first human kill, while also experimenting with his undifferentiated sexuality and anger.

Recently, I have been studying the murders of those three 8-yr-old boys in Arkansas, where there may be three men wrongfully in prison for those murders, one on death row. What is also intersting there, is that a forensic profiler, who also was very active in the unabomber case, did a re-analysis of the Arkansas autopsies of the three eight-year-old boys' murders and was the one who pointed out that the marks on two of the victims' bodies were HUMAN BITE MARKS, which I believe has been confirmed by experts who do this type of dental forensic work, AND which bite marks do not match any of those convicted and in prison for the murders. This certainly reminds me of Lou Smit's work and with other experts' help showing that marks on JonBenet were from a stun gun. In both cases, the types of the marks were not recognized by the cororners at the time of the autopsies. I don't think the cororners should be criticized. Communities can get whatever expertise they are willing to pay for.