The autopsy described the injuries to Jonbenét's genitals and then ends with this.

"No recent or remote anal or other perineal trauma is identified."

To me that means no evidence of prior injuries. Period.

Anyone care to play devil's advocate here and interpret it differently?

If that is true - no prior abuse - then the blood in her panties - and the DNA mixed with that blood - is new and evidence associated with the crime.

The newinvestigators know this - they are doing the DNA tests even as we speak - - WHY is the BORG online having such a hard time acceptint hat?

WHY are they still trying to revise the 911 tape? Why deny that the panties were JonBenét's and no one changed her panties that night?

The BORG makes no sense to me.

TheDNA makes lots of sense - and the killer can still be identified and prosecuted, convicted, punished.