There is no problem for the Ramseys to have stated that JonBenét was awake when they arrived home.

There is no problem for the Ramseys to have stated JonBenét ate some pineapple - whenever - before leaving for the Whites, at the Whites, on the way home from the Whites, or after they got home.

By denying any knowledge of the pineapple, they have created all kinds of speculation. It would have been EASIER to have said she was awake, had a snack that included pineapple, and went off to bed.

I think there are BORG theorists who think the Ramseys were LOCKED into their "lie" about JonBenét being asleep. Well, then WHY, when confronted with the pineapple in the bowl on the table, wouldn't Patsy have just said - Yes, I did have fresh pineapple in the fridge and Yes, JonBenét or Burke COULD have gotten up to get a snack. WHO would have challenged that and made that into any indication of guilt?

Turning this red herring into an indication of guilt is ridiculous and underemploys the use of logic IMO. Do these 'theorists' think Patsy FORGOT about that bowl of pineapple, FORGOT JonBenét was awake? What difference does either fact make for them to lie about it? If the Ramseys were lying about the details of that night, they would stick CLOSE TO THE TRUTH on matters that have no bearing on their involvement. Whether or not JB was awake has no bearing and neither would her snacking on pineapple have any bearing.