nature. I find Linda's thoughts in Chapter l particularly disturbing, compared to what she portrayed publically earlier. Was that all an act, to show she didn't harbor any ill will towards the Ramseys? She was a logical person of interest in the beginning, and the Ramseys said nothing in their book to libel her....in fact they said the opposite...but she did ask for a loan, and the ransom note, if you take it at face value was all about money.

If those are her words in Chapter l, then she admits she knew about key phrases in the ransom note. What's even more ludicrous is everything she accuses Patsy of knowing, Linda knew too, and she comes out and says she did. What makes her above reproach? That in of itself, should cause those investigating the crime to take another look.....a look at her interviews with the police soon after the crime---a look at what she said to the GJ. This shouldn't be chalked up to a woman scorned.

One thing that always bothered me about the loan, was it was a good excuse if someone from her family were found in the Ramsey house in the middle of the night---before JBR was taken from her bed. It would be a good excuse as to why they were in the house, if detected.

I can't imagine turning against someone the way LHP has, in the way she has, even for money. This whole thing doesn't make sense---the ppossibiity of a contempt charge......and libel, considering the judge's design in the Wolf case, and Mary Keenan's public announcement that they were looking at an intruder. Why is Darnay ccontinuing with the "Patsy Did It" mantra?