Go back to previous page
Forum URL: http://www.webbsleuths.com/cgi-bin/dcf/dcboard.cgi
Forum Name: more and more JBR
Topic ID: 2011
Message ID: 19
#19, RE: What was LHP really saying
Posted by Margoo on Jan-03-04 at 01:02 AM
In response to message #18

Unlike other authors who have written books about the case before us, we were actually part of the Ramsey household.

Who is “we”? Note how the writing goes from the singular “I” to the plural “we”. (Where have we seen that before??)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
So, what did we learn from LHP:
We “learn” John & Patsy – in LHP’s opinion – were not overtly affectionate. (Startling news.)
We “learn” that Patsy did not care for sex, particularly oral sex. (Whew! I was really wondering about that!)
We learn that John does not think Patsy is much of a homemaker and cook. (But she’s a great mother!)
We learn what LHP told the Grand Jury. (She was a BIG help!)
We learn that LHP thinks Patsy’s faith is “strange”.
We learn that LHP saw the original ransom note and found the HandPRINTING to be very similar to Patsy’s HandWRITING.
We learn that LHP is inconsistent. First she says Patsy probably forced John to help her cover up, then she says he slept through the night (with the aide of melatonin) and wouldn’t have “heard a cannon go off”.
We learn that LHP can spell Beringer Chardonnay (but can she pronounce it?).
We learn the artificial Christmas trees were “plastic”!!
LHP worked for the Ramseys for "14 months", oops, I mean “nearly a year”.
We learn that the "red pocket knife with broken ornament (41KKY)" was found beside JonBenét’s body and that it was the Swiss Army Knife (I wonder how LHP knows that).
We learn that the duct tape was cut with the knife (although I recall it was torn from the roll).
We learn that LHP has nothing to tell us.