Carol said, "... there has never been any
evidence to link an intruder to her brutal
murder."

Rose asked, "Could it be that Carol's argument will be that there is no "conclusive physical evidence" that does link an intruder?"

Intruder evidence includes:

use of a stun gun when LE can't find any evidence that the family had access to one.

the cord found on the body doesn't match anything in the house and the BPD could never link the parents to such a cord.

ditto on the duct tape

The handwriting on the ransom note doesn't match any of the Ramseys.

The fresh boot print found near the body remains unsourced.

There is DNA under JonBenét's nails and mixed with the blood in her panties that doesn't come from any family member.

It seems to me that all of that is conclusive physical evidence that points to an intruder.

And that is not all of it.

Carol saw Lou Smit's presentation, she can't say she was in the dark about that evidence. She knew about it and chose to mislead the public. To me that is defamatory reporting.

FOX will try to get the case dismissed to start - every time there has been a lawsuit the first thing is the defendants ask for the suit to be dismissed.... but I think the judge will see the merits of the lawsuit and after that I think FOX will ask for a chance to settle and save the cost of lawyers and more court costs.

JMO