Go back to previous page
Forum URL: http://www.webbsleuths.com/cgi-bin/dcf/dcboard.cgi
Forum Name: more and more JBR
Topic ID: 2005
Message ID: 2
#2, RE: Abrams Dec 29, 2003
Posted by Margoo on Dec-30-03 at 11:17 PM
In response to message #1
CASIMIR: Joe, I just want to make one comment here. There was another blood sample found, you know, earlier on in the case. It was eliminated as being any member of the family. There is something to be said about the idea that sometimes cops when they have a belief in something, they‘re going to go full throttle on it and they‘re going to ignore some other evidence. I mean we‘re not discussing that here, but obviously that must be—that‘s part of the case.
The Ramseys have been under suspicion for years. Everybody thought they were guilty in one sense or the other and just the prosecution or the government messed up the case. And here you have a situation where blood samples were there before eliminating all family members. That didn‘t stop the suspicion from going forward and here we have another blood sample that might have been tested that would have eliminated someone even further. So you know, no one is discussing that element of how the investigation works and how hunches—hunches are a great tool in police investigations, but sometimes they do cause this kind of, you know, mass hysteria.

It really is a shame that this case was so poorly handled. The blood samples have been there all along (and I strongly suspect "DNA-X" is the DNA found in the second blood spot, just a better, more complete profile of the DNA; there all along, from day one). So many people could have been saved so much grief (but then, I'd never have 'met' some of you! - lol).

There is some complaint that no one was on this show to represent the anti-Ramsey. Could be because they are getting fewer and farther between, less willing to speak out on national tv with their outdated views.