Jams,

Weren't we supposed to be hearing something dramatic from "the lab" a couple of weeks ago? It's been about seven months since the recordings were made available, if I've got my dates right. Based on my experience in hi-tech, seven months is a LOOOOOONNNNG time. It's actually longer than the time interval between successive product launches in some technical areas. It's 75% of an academic year.

If this so-called "lab" is reputable, they should have already reported their findings, even if those findings are negative --- unless they're doing it "for hire," which seems unlikely. They should say, "Here's what we did; these are the results; this is our interpretation." It seems to me that there is no such report; is that still correct as far as you (or anyone else) know?

Thanks for any information.