LAST EDITED ON Jul-13-03 AT 10:23 PM (EST)
 
>
I believe I have asked several questions about this whole thing. Something doesn't look right to me and whichever "side" is the problem ... doesn't matter. Something is not right about the story right from April 1997 and something still isn't right.

>The NBC version of the 911 tape is a joke. Katie Couric, as
>I suspected (Jameson did too, by the way, if you read her
>first post again), chimed right in with her pointless
>comment JUST at the crucial moment we were all waiting for.
>She just obliterated it -- clearly she is totally clueless
>as to what that tape is all about.

As I recall, Katie "chimed in" about 5 seconds after Patsy hung up. Katie also was quite aware of what the specialists had (not) found on the tape. I think that is an unfair assessment of what Katie was working with (she already knew there was nothing for us to hear) and longer silence (while the show was broadcasting) would have been pointless.
>
>So WHY all this crowing on and on about how this somehow
>proves something about the investigation? As in some sort
>of conspiracy on the part of the BPD (also apparently the
>CBI, FBI, Secret Service, who else?). The important part
>of the tape wasn't heard at all on the Couric show. NO
>conclusions should have been drawn at that point. Everyone
>should just have been scratching their heads.

I believe that is what many of us were in fact doing (scratching our heads).

I know for a fact that over the past two days I have posted (several times) something wasn't right about the whole deal (and I don't think I felt I was alone on that score). Can you answer them for me? What made the BPD go to an enhancement in the first place; was it the first electronic 'erp' sound or the second electronic 'erp' sound? Explain this whole fiasco, if you will. What started the BPD on this track?

(BTW, IMO, mistakes are one thing false stories are quite another.)